Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.138 The Sentencing Commissi<strong>on</strong> asserted that this disparity can largely be traced to the structure and<br />
severity of mandatory minimum penalties. It observed that mandatory minimum provisi<strong>on</strong>s typically use a<br />
limited number of aggravating factors to trigger the prescribed penalty, without regard to the possibility<br />
that mitigating circumstances surrounding the offence or the offender might justify a lower sentence. For<br />
such a sentence to be reas<strong>on</strong>able in every case, it observed, the factors triggering the mandatory<br />
minimum penalty must always warrant the prescribed mandatory minimum penalty, regardless of the<br />
individualised circumstances of the offence or the offender. It noted that this cannot be the situati<strong>on</strong> for<br />
all cases and thus suggested that C<strong>on</strong>gress should c<strong>on</strong>sider whether a statutory “safety valve”<br />
mechanism, similar to the <strong>on</strong>e available for certain drug trafficking offenders, might be appropriately<br />
tailored for low-level, n<strong>on</strong>-violent offenders c<strong>on</strong>victed of other offences carrying mandatory minimum<br />
penalties.<br />
4.139 By c<strong>on</strong>trast with mandatory minimum penalties, the Sentencing Commissi<strong>on</strong> observed that<br />
sentencing guidelines prescribe proporti<strong>on</strong>al, individualised sentences, based <strong>on</strong> many factors relating to<br />
the seriousness of the offence and the criminal history and other characteristics of the offender. It<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cluded that this multi-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al approach to sentencing seeks to avoid the problems inherent in the<br />
structure of mandatory minimum penalties and, for this reas<strong>on</strong>, best serves the purposes of the<br />
Sentencing <strong>Reform</strong> Act.<br />
(e)<br />
Canada<br />
4.140 Under the first Canadian Criminal Code of 1892, mandatory minimum sentences applied in<br />
respect of six offences, most of which related to corrupti<strong>on</strong>. 296 In recent decades, however, Canada has<br />
witnessed a marked increase in the use of this mode of punishment. 297 Minimum sentences are now<br />
prescribed for certain drug offences, firearms offences, sexual offences committed against children, and<br />
serious fraud. In this secti<strong>on</strong>, the Commissi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>siders the applicati<strong>on</strong> of these sentencing regimes to<br />
offenders c<strong>on</strong>victed for the first time of a specified offence. The enhanced minimum penalties applicable<br />
to repeat offenders are addressed in Chapter 5.<br />
(i)<br />
Drug Offences<br />
4.141 Numerous drug offences attract a mandatory minimum sentence under the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and<br />
Substances Act, as amended. 298<br />
4.142 First, a minimum sentence of <strong>on</strong>e year applies where the following offences are committed in<br />
prescribed circumstances: (i) trafficking in a substance listed in Schedule I or Schedule II to the Act or<br />
any substance represented or held out to be such a substance, 299 and (ii) possessing a substance listed<br />
296<br />
297<br />
298<br />
299<br />
Crutcher “<strong>Mandatory</strong> Minimum Penalties of Impris<strong>on</strong>ment: An Historical Analysis” (2000-2001) 44 Crim. L.Q.<br />
279 at 280.<br />
Ibid at 279.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 39 - secti<strong>on</strong> 46 of the Safe Streets and Communities Act.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 5(1) of the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and Substances Act.<br />
Schedule I lists the following substances, as well as their preparati<strong>on</strong>s, derivatives, alkaloids and salts: (i)<br />
opium poppy; (ii) coca; (iii) phenylpiperidines; (iv) phenazepines; (v) amid<strong>on</strong>es; (vi) methadols; (vii)<br />
phenalkoxams; (viii) thiambutenes; (ix) moramides; (x) morphinans; (xi) benzazocines; (xii) ampromides; (xiii)<br />
benzimidazoles; (xiv) phencyclidine; (xv) piritramide; (xvi) fentanyls; (xvii) tilidine; (xviii)<br />
methylenedioxypyrovaler<strong>on</strong>e; and (xix) methamphetamine. The substance referred to in Schedule 2 to the Act<br />
is cannabis, including its preparati<strong>on</strong>s, derivatives and similar synthetic preparati<strong>on</strong>s. Not included are n<strong>on</strong>viable<br />
cannabis seed, with the excepti<strong>on</strong> of its derivatives, or mature cannabis stalks that do not include<br />
leaves, flowers, seeds or branches; and fiber derived from such stalks.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 5(3)(a.1) of the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and Substances Act, as inserted by secti<strong>on</strong> 39 of the Safe Streets<br />
and Communities Act, further specifies that this regime will not apply where the subject matter of the offence is<br />
a substance included in Schedule II in an amount not more than that set out for that substance in Schedule<br />
VII.<br />
160