04.02.2015 Views

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.138 The Sentencing Commissi<strong>on</strong> asserted that this disparity can largely be traced to the structure and<br />

severity of mandatory minimum penalties. It observed that mandatory minimum provisi<strong>on</strong>s typically use a<br />

limited number of aggravating factors to trigger the prescribed penalty, without regard to the possibility<br />

that mitigating circumstances surrounding the offence or the offender might justify a lower sentence. For<br />

such a sentence to be reas<strong>on</strong>able in every case, it observed, the factors triggering the mandatory<br />

minimum penalty must always warrant the prescribed mandatory minimum penalty, regardless of the<br />

individualised circumstances of the offence or the offender. It noted that this cannot be the situati<strong>on</strong> for<br />

all cases and thus suggested that C<strong>on</strong>gress should c<strong>on</strong>sider whether a statutory “safety valve”<br />

mechanism, similar to the <strong>on</strong>e available for certain drug trafficking offenders, might be appropriately<br />

tailored for low-level, n<strong>on</strong>-violent offenders c<strong>on</strong>victed of other offences carrying mandatory minimum<br />

penalties.<br />

4.139 By c<strong>on</strong>trast with mandatory minimum penalties, the Sentencing Commissi<strong>on</strong> observed that<br />

sentencing guidelines prescribe proporti<strong>on</strong>al, individualised sentences, based <strong>on</strong> many factors relating to<br />

the seriousness of the offence and the criminal history and other characteristics of the offender. It<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cluded that this multi-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al approach to sentencing seeks to avoid the problems inherent in the<br />

structure of mandatory minimum penalties and, for this reas<strong>on</strong>, best serves the purposes of the<br />

Sentencing <strong>Reform</strong> Act.<br />

(e)<br />

Canada<br />

4.140 Under the first Canadian Criminal Code of 1892, mandatory minimum sentences applied in<br />

respect of six offences, most of which related to corrupti<strong>on</strong>. 296 In recent decades, however, Canada has<br />

witnessed a marked increase in the use of this mode of punishment. 297 Minimum sentences are now<br />

prescribed for certain drug offences, firearms offences, sexual offences committed against children, and<br />

serious fraud. In this secti<strong>on</strong>, the Commissi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>siders the applicati<strong>on</strong> of these sentencing regimes to<br />

offenders c<strong>on</strong>victed for the first time of a specified offence. The enhanced minimum penalties applicable<br />

to repeat offenders are addressed in Chapter 5.<br />

(i)<br />

Drug Offences<br />

4.141 Numerous drug offences attract a mandatory minimum sentence under the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and<br />

Substances Act, as amended. 298<br />

4.142 First, a minimum sentence of <strong>on</strong>e year applies where the following offences are committed in<br />

prescribed circumstances: (i) trafficking in a substance listed in Schedule I or Schedule II to the Act or<br />

any substance represented or held out to be such a substance, 299 and (ii) possessing a substance listed<br />

296<br />

297<br />

298<br />

299<br />

Crutcher “<strong>Mandatory</strong> Minimum Penalties of Impris<strong>on</strong>ment: An Historical Analysis” (2000-2001) 44 Crim. L.Q.<br />

279 at 280.<br />

Ibid at 279.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 39 - secti<strong>on</strong> 46 of the Safe Streets and Communities Act.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 5(1) of the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and Substances Act.<br />

Schedule I lists the following substances, as well as their preparati<strong>on</strong>s, derivatives, alkaloids and salts: (i)<br />

opium poppy; (ii) coca; (iii) phenylpiperidines; (iv) phenazepines; (v) amid<strong>on</strong>es; (vi) methadols; (vii)<br />

phenalkoxams; (viii) thiambutenes; (ix) moramides; (x) morphinans; (xi) benzazocines; (xii) ampromides; (xiii)<br />

benzimidazoles; (xiv) phencyclidine; (xv) piritramide; (xvi) fentanyls; (xvii) tilidine; (xviii)<br />

methylenedioxypyrovaler<strong>on</strong>e; and (xix) methamphetamine. The substance referred to in Schedule 2 to the Act<br />

is cannabis, including its preparati<strong>on</strong>s, derivatives and similar synthetic preparati<strong>on</strong>s. Not included are n<strong>on</strong>viable<br />

cannabis seed, with the excepti<strong>on</strong> of its derivatives, or mature cannabis stalks that do not include<br />

leaves, flowers, seeds or branches; and fiber derived from such stalks.<br />

Secti<strong>on</strong> 5(3)(a.1) of the C<strong>on</strong>trolled Drugs and Substances Act, as inserted by secti<strong>on</strong> 39 of the Safe Streets<br />

and Communities Act, further specifies that this regime will not apply where the subject matter of the offence is<br />

a substance included in Schedule II in an amount not more than that set out for that substance in Schedule<br />

VII.<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!