Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Report on Mandatory Sentences - Law Reform Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
c<strong>on</strong>sidering whether this c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> is met, the court must c<strong>on</strong>template the sentence that it would have<br />
imposed but for secti<strong>on</strong> 224A, disregarding any extensi<strong>on</strong> period that it would have applied under secti<strong>on</strong><br />
226A. 37 Thomas notes that because the sentencing court must be willing to impose a sentence of at least<br />
10 years having taken account of all relevant c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s (including the offender’s plea), the ‘sentence<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>’ sets a “very high threshold” 38 for the impositi<strong>on</strong> of a life sentence.<br />
5.35 The “previous offence c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>” stipulates that the offender must, at the time when the sec<strong>on</strong>d<br />
offence was committed, have a prior c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong> for an offence listed in any part of Schedule 15B 39 and<br />
have received a “relevant life sentence” or a “relevant sentence of impris<strong>on</strong>ment” for that prior offence. 40<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 224A(5) clarifies that a “relevant life sentence” is <strong>on</strong>e where the offender was not eligible for<br />
release during the first five years (not taking into account any period spent <strong>on</strong> remand or bail). Any<br />
extended sentence 41 or other determinate sentence of impris<strong>on</strong>ment or detenti<strong>on</strong> 42 will be c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />
relevant where the custodial term was at least 10 years. Secti<strong>on</strong> 224A(9) provides that any reducti<strong>on</strong> in<br />
sentence for the purpose of taking account of time spent <strong>on</strong> remand, either in custody or <strong>on</strong> bail, is to be<br />
disregarded when c<strong>on</strong>sidering whether the “previous offence c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>” has been met. Thomas suggests<br />
that very few offenders are likely to satisfy both the “sentence c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>” and the “previous offence<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>” and that, as a result, “the impositi<strong>on</strong> of a new-style automatic life sentence will be a rare event<br />
indeed.” 43<br />
5.36 The presumptive life sentence prescribed by secti<strong>on</strong> 224A has been described as a “most<br />
peculiar provisi<strong>on</strong>”. 44 Although referred to as a ‘mandatory’ provisi<strong>on</strong> by the Government, 45 it is clear that<br />
a life sentence need <strong>on</strong>ly be imposed under this regime where it would be just in all the circumstances of<br />
the case. As the courts will always seek to impose a sentence that is just in the circumstances, the<br />
purpose of this reform has been called into questi<strong>on</strong>. 46<br />
37<br />
38<br />
39<br />
40<br />
41<br />
42<br />
43<br />
44<br />
45<br />
46<br />
Subject to certain c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, secti<strong>on</strong> 226A permits the impositi<strong>on</strong> of extended sentences up<strong>on</strong> certain violent<br />
or sexual offenders who are aged at least 18 years.<br />
Thomas “The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012: The Sentencing Provisi<strong>on</strong>s”<br />
(2012) 8 Criminal <strong>Law</strong> Review 572 at 573.<br />
In additi<strong>on</strong> to the 44 offences listed in Part 1, Schedule 15B lists under Part 2, the crime of murder and any<br />
offence that was abolished (with or without savings) prior to the Schedule coming into force and which would,<br />
if committed <strong>on</strong> the relevant day, have c<strong>on</strong>stituted an offence specified in Part 1 of the Schedule. For the<br />
purposes of secti<strong>on</strong> 224A(4), the ‘relevant day’ is that <strong>on</strong> which the offender was c<strong>on</strong>victed of the offence<br />
referred to in secti<strong>on</strong> 224A(1)(a). Part 3 of the Schedule further lists an array of offences under service law,<br />
while Part 4 includes any offence for which the pers<strong>on</strong> was c<strong>on</strong>victed in Scotland, Northern Ireland or a<br />
member state other than the United Kingdom and which, if committed in England and Wales at the time of<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>, would have c<strong>on</strong>stituted an offence specified in Part 1 or Part 2 of the Schedule.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 224A(4) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 224A(6) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong> 224A(8) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.<br />
Thomas “The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012: The Sentencing Provisi<strong>on</strong>s”<br />
(2012) 8 Criminal <strong>Law</strong> Review 572 at 573. See also: Pict<strong>on</strong> “The Effect of the Changes in Sentencing of<br />
Dangerous Offenders Brought About by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 and<br />
the Mystery of Schedule 15B” (2013) 5 Criminal <strong>Law</strong> Review 406 at 408.<br />
Anth<strong>on</strong>y Lloyd “Two strikes and then a mandatory life sentence No” The Guardian 19 March 2012.<br />
See: Hansard, House of Comm<strong>on</strong>s, Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill, 1 November<br />
2011, Column 788.<br />
Anth<strong>on</strong>y Lloyd “Two strikes and then a mandatory life sentence No” The Guardian 19 March 2012.<br />
191