15.02.2015 Views

pink-book

pink-book

pink-book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Avoid counting or quantifying types of<br />

responses (e.g., “75 percent of participants<br />

preferred concept A”). Attempting to quantify<br />

the results—or suggesting in other ways that<br />

they represent the opinions of the intended<br />

audience as a whole—is inappropriate for<br />

qualitative research.<br />

Quasi-Quantitative Research Methods:<br />

Pretesting Messages and Materials<br />

Some commonly used communication<br />

research methods, such as central-location<br />

intercept interviews and theater tests, are<br />

best termed quasi-quantitative. While these<br />

methods are used in situations in which the<br />

goal is measurement and typically involve a<br />

questionnaire with mostly forced-choice<br />

questions, the results cannot be projected to<br />

the population as a whole (as with true<br />

quantitative surveys) because of the way in<br />

which participants are selected. For centrallocation<br />

intercept interviews, the only people<br />

who have a chance to participate are those<br />

who go to the location where the interviews<br />

are being held and who go there during the<br />

times they are conducted; this is not a truly<br />

representative sample of the intended<br />

audience. For theater tests, the only people<br />

who have a chance to participate are those<br />

who are recruited for the test, and<br />

recruitment does not follow a truly<br />

representative sampling design.<br />

Quasi-quantitative methods are most often<br />

used during Stage 2 to pretest messages<br />

and materials. If your intended audience is<br />

geographically dispersed or it is difficult for<br />

them to get to a central facility, you can use<br />

telephone interviews and send participants<br />

any materials in advance. This type of<br />

pretest typically resembles an in-depth<br />

interviewing project in price and number of<br />

interviews, although there may be more<br />

closed-ended questions and the question<br />

sequence may be adhered to more closely.<br />

THE MODERATOR’S ROLE<br />

The moderator does not need to be an<br />

expert in the subject of your research<br />

but must have experience facilitating<br />

group discussions. A good moderator<br />

builds rapport and trust and probes,<br />

without reacting to or influencing,<br />

participants’ opinions. The moderator<br />

must be able to lead the discussion and<br />

not be led by the group. He or she must<br />

emphasize that there are no right or<br />

wrong answers to the questions that are<br />

posed. A good moderator understands<br />

the process of eliciting comments, keeps<br />

the discussion on track, and figures out<br />

other ways of approaching a topic if the<br />

first way is unproductive. Good<br />

moderators understand what you are<br />

looking for and what you need to do<br />

with the information, and they are able<br />

to probe and guide the discussion<br />

accordingly. Go over the guide with the<br />

moderator to point out any topics or<br />

concerns you want emphasized or<br />

discussed in depth. By the end of the<br />

focus group or interview, the moderator<br />

should ensure that all agreed-upon<br />

topics are covered sufficiently.<br />

If your organization plans to conduct<br />

focus groups regularly, consider hiring<br />

a skilled, experienced moderator to<br />

train your internal staff to moderate<br />

focus groups. Use local advertising<br />

agencies, the American Marketing<br />

Association’s Focus Group Directory,<br />

or the Qualitative Research<br />

Consultants Association to identify<br />

a good moderator.<br />

METHODS<br />

Making Health Communication Programs Work 141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!