Final Report - RI Department of Children, Youth & Families
Final Report - RI Department of Children, Youth & Families
Final Report - RI Department of Children, Youth & Families
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 6: PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND OUTCOMES<br />
Key to the success <strong>of</strong> the system is the ability to effectively measure and evaluate system<br />
performance and client outcomes for children, youth and families and to use these evaluations<br />
to modify and further develop best practices. The system highly values the importance <strong>of</strong><br />
effective performance and outcome measurement at all levels.<br />
The system <strong>of</strong> care’s culture supports evaluation and employs a comprehensive evaluation<br />
strategy including the three components <strong>of</strong> context evaluation, implementation evaluation<br />
and outcome evaluation (see Appendix K). This provides a sophisticated analysis <strong>of</strong> how<br />
and why programs and services work, for whom they work, and under what circumstances<br />
they work. The system <strong>of</strong> care evaluation component:<br />
! Examines how the system functions within the economic, social, and political<br />
environment <strong>of</strong> its community and setting (context evaluation);<br />
! Supports the planning, set up, and implementation <strong>of</strong> the system as well as documents<br />
the evolution <strong>of</strong> the system (implementation evaluation); and,<br />
! Assesses the short and long-term results <strong>of</strong> the system (outcome evaluation).<br />
These three measurements serve as the foundation and guide for the development <strong>of</strong><br />
performance and outcome recommendations for the system <strong>of</strong> care. The recommendations<br />
themselves are tiered to focus on the need for a higher level system reform that must be<br />
maintained within the authority <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Children</strong>’s Cabinet and to recognize the work necessary<br />
at the level <strong>of</strong> state departments - individually and collectively.<br />
On a direct agency level, there is a recognition that DCYF is accomplishing two distinct<br />
goals. One is building system capacity. The second is developing a regionally based network<br />
system <strong>of</strong> care which is specifically designed to address increasing demands and changes in<br />
service needs for children and families at varying levels <strong>of</strong> intensity in a community context.<br />
Moreover, the <strong>Children</strong>’s Cabinet continues its work with <strong>RI</strong> KIDS Count to develop child<br />
indicators to assist the state in achieving the four outcomes adopted by the Cabinet and state<br />
agencies. Toward this end, DCYF and other state agencies continue their work in building<br />
performance measures and outcomes into service delivery both internally and with providers.<br />
PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND OUTCOMES RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
1. $ The <strong>Children</strong>’s Cabinet must develop, implement and fund an<br />
evaluation/accountability plan to comprehensively assess the State’s effectiveness<br />
in implementing the recommendations <strong>of</strong> this report over the five year phase-in<br />
period. The development <strong>of</strong> this plan must include families (parents, kin, foster<br />
and adoptive families).<br />
It must be recognized that there is a significant cost associated with developing the<br />
appropriate infrastructure to accommodate these information requirements, and the<br />
State must establish this as a priority investment. Each <strong>Department</strong> must identify its<br />
own financing needs for enhancing the data collection and analysis capability for its<br />
own services and population, and the provider community must to do the same. This<br />
System <strong>of</strong> Care Task Force <strong>Report</strong> (January 2003) 51