Final Report - RI Department of Children, Youth & Families
Final Report - RI Department of Children, Youth & Families
Final Report - RI Department of Children, Youth & Families
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
TRANSMITTAL LETTER<br />
organized plan) to developing a structure for a new system <strong>of</strong> care that is family-centered,<br />
community-based and in which programs and services are measured against agreed upon<br />
outcomes.<br />
The reports and the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the two planning committees are included as<br />
appendices to this document. The vision and structure outlined in the body <strong>of</strong> the Task Force<br />
report is based on the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Ideal System <strong>of</strong> Care Committee. Our vision<br />
recognizes that the resource needs identified in the other two committee reports can be<br />
effectively addressed only through a true “paradigm shift” which ensures that we move to<br />
structures and processes which emphasize community-based prevention, strengthen families<br />
and communities and more clearly define the parameters used to determine when a child or<br />
youth is placed out-<strong>of</strong>-home. These details must be used to inform the work <strong>of</strong> those who are<br />
tasked with planning and improving Rhode Island’s new System <strong>of</strong> Care.<br />
As the leaders <strong>of</strong> the Task Force, we believe it important to point out two critical partners for<br />
moving ahead – the judiciary and the provider and advocacy communities.<br />
Rhode Island enjoys a very active and involved Family Court bench which unquestionably<br />
seeks to ensure that children and their families are provided with the highest quality <strong>of</strong><br />
services and supports available. The reality, however, is that the authority for expenditures<br />
and the control <strong>of</strong> those expenditures is extremely diffuse. As long as this diffusion<br />
continues, the State will have difficulty focusing on priorities, achieving the best possible<br />
outcomes and controlling expenditures. The challenge before us is to more clearly define<br />
roles within our system and thereby achieve greater quality, greater accountability and a more<br />
cost effective approach to delivering services and supports to children and their families.<br />
Likewise, Rhode Island’s provider and advocacy communities are aggressive in providing<br />
input and feedback, especially in regard to the functions and practices <strong>of</strong> DCYF. Two-thirds<br />
<strong>of</strong> DCYF’s expenditures flow to private providers. We must continue to include these voices<br />
at the table while recognizing that some perspectives represent narrow interests and arriving<br />
at consensus for significant and critical improvements can be elusive.<br />
<strong>Final</strong>ly, the Task Force strongly endorsed the <strong>Children</strong>’s Cabinet as the principle body to<br />
oversee the implementation <strong>of</strong> these recommendations. The Cabinet has become a truly<br />
effective vehicle for interagency collaboration and systems reform. We encourage you to use<br />
the Cabinet as the steering authority for the System <strong>of</strong> Care Implementation Committee<br />
modeled after the successful Welfare Reform and Starting <strong>RI</strong>ght Committees. As described in<br />
this report, we see the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Children</strong>, <strong>Youth</strong> and <strong>Families</strong> (DCYF) as the lead<br />
agency staffing this committee with additional staffing commitments from each <strong>of</strong> the other<br />
executive departments that have the authority and responsibility for the delivery <strong>of</strong> health,<br />
human and educational services to our children, youth and families.<br />
System <strong>of</strong> Care Task Force <strong>Report</strong> (January 2003) 8