05.03.2015 Views

Industrial seal self study guide - SKF.com

Industrial seal self study guide - SKF.com

Industrial seal self study guide - SKF.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Seal Selection (cont.)<br />

l<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Seal Selection Criteria<br />

Factors to consider when selecting a <strong>seal</strong> for a particular application<br />

(fig. 5c) include:<br />

H<br />

F<br />

A variety of factors determine<br />

proper <strong>seal</strong> selection (fig. 5c).<br />

E<br />

G<br />

D<br />

C<br />

• Basic <strong>seal</strong> function<br />

• Shaft surface finish (A)<br />

• Shaft speed and direction (G)<br />

• Shaft and bore conditions (B)<br />

• Shaft eccentricity (E)<br />

• Seal material/lubricant <strong>com</strong>patibility<br />

• Underlip temperature (F)<br />

• Contaminants (abrasiveness) (C)<br />

• Pressure (internal/external) (I)<br />

PERCENT FAILURE<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

(fig. 5d)<br />

DUAL LIP<br />

SEAL<br />

SINGLE LIP<br />

SEAL<br />

RELATIVE TIME TO FAILURE<br />

In many applications, <strong>seal</strong> life can be extended simply by substituting<br />

the same size <strong>seal</strong> (O.D. and I.D.), but of slightly different design or with<br />

a different lip material. A narrower <strong>seal</strong> width can usually be used (see<br />

following “Seal Width vs. Seal Performance” section). The <strong>seal</strong> selected<br />

must be able to meet the application’s requirements for operating<br />

temperature, pressure, and other factors listed above.<br />

Single Lip vs. Double Lip Seals Test Results<br />

In its development of new <strong>seal</strong> designs, <strong>SKF</strong> has conducted extensive<br />

testing. One series of tests has <strong>com</strong>pared single lip with double lip<br />

<strong>seal</strong>s (fig. 5d). Test objectives were to determine:<br />

• Does the double lip <strong>seal</strong>’s secondary (dust) lip help or hinder<br />

the primary lip?<br />

• How does the double lip <strong>seal</strong>’s overall performance <strong>com</strong>pare<br />

with that of the single lip <strong>seal</strong>?<br />

During testing, these measurements were taken:<br />

Test results:<br />

• Temperature vs. shaft speed.<br />

• Dust ingestion vs. time.<br />

• Peak performance vs. temperature rise.<br />

• The double lip <strong>seal</strong> failed at 270 hours.<br />

• The single lip <strong>seal</strong>, tested under identical conditions, was still<br />

running at 1254 hours.<br />

• The single lip <strong>seal</strong> was proven to run four times longer than<br />

the double lip <strong>seal</strong>.<br />

48<br />

• The single lip <strong>seal</strong> runs cooler.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!