PUC Annual ReportâFiscal Year 2011-12 - Public Utilities Commission
PUC Annual ReportâFiscal Year 2011-12 - Public Utilities Commission
PUC Annual ReportâFiscal Year 2011-12 - Public Utilities Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Utilities</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> Report <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>12</strong><br />
State of Hawaii Page 39<br />
• MECO 20<strong>12</strong> Test <strong>Year</strong> Rate Increase Request—Docket No. <strong>2011</strong>-0092<br />
In July <strong>2011</strong>, MECO filed an application requesting a general rate increase<br />
of $27,523,000, or approximately 6.68 percent, based on a total estimated<br />
revenue requirement of $439,377,000 for the 20<strong>12</strong> test year. In addition to the<br />
rate increase, MECO proposes to establish a purchased power adjustment<br />
clause to recover non-energy purchased power cost, revise its ECAC tariff, and<br />
implement a change in accounting for administrative and general transfers to<br />
construction projects.<br />
In an order issued on May 21, 20<strong>12</strong>, the <strong>Commission</strong> approved an interim<br />
rate increase in revenues of $13,089,000 or approximately 3.16 percent based<br />
on a 20<strong>12</strong> test year. In this interim decision, the <strong>Commission</strong> also approved<br />
revisions to the ECAC, changes in accounting, and considered other MECO<br />
requests.<br />
• HELCO 2010 Test <strong>Year</strong> Rate Increase Request—Docket No. 2009-0164<br />
On December 9, 2009, HELCO filed an application requesting a general<br />
rate increase of $20,934,500 (approximately 6.0 percent) over its revenues at<br />
current effective rates. In addition, HELCO proposes to establish: (1) a<br />
purchased power adjustment clause/surcharge to recover non-energy purchased<br />
power agreement costs by effectively transferring the recovery of purchased<br />
power costs from base rates to the new surcharge that will be adjusted monthly<br />
and reconciled on a quarterly basis; and (2) a revenue balancing account for a<br />
revenue decoupling mechanism that will remove the linkage between electric<br />
revenues and sales, if such a revenue balancing account is not otherwise<br />
approved by the <strong>Commission</strong> in its separate revenue decoupling investigative<br />
proceeding, Docket No. 2008-0274.<br />
On November 3, 2010, the <strong>Commission</strong> issued its Interim Decision and<br />
Order, which approved an interim increase of $5,956,000 over revenues at<br />
present rates rather than the $20,934,500 that was requested in the application.<br />
In a Decision and Order issued on April 4, 20<strong>12</strong>, the <strong>Commission</strong> approved a<br />
rate increase of $4,494,000 over its revenues at current effective rates.<br />
• HELCO 2013 Test <strong>Year</strong> Rate Increase Request—Docket No. 20<strong>12</strong>-0099<br />
On August 16, 20<strong>12</strong>, HELCO filed an application requesting a general rate<br />
increase of $19,808,000 (approximately 4.2 percent) over its revenues at present<br />
rates. HELCO, as part of its overall request, also seeks the <strong>Commission</strong>'s<br />
approval of: (1) an interim increase in its revenues at present rates through an<br />
interim 2013 test year surcharge, pending the <strong>Commission</strong>'s issuance of its final<br />
decision; and (2) other requests that it proposes to take effect simultaneously<br />
with any interim increase in revenues that is approved by the commission,<br />
including: (A) certain accounting changes; (B) the re-setting of its target heat<br />
rates by fuel type and its loss factor to 2013 test year levels for the purpose of<br />
calculating its existing energy cost adjustment clause; and (C) changes in the<br />
monthly allocation factors and the basis for these factors in the revenue<br />
balancing account provision of its existing revenue decoupling mechanism. On<br />
October 29 and October 30, 20<strong>12</strong>, the <strong>Commission</strong> held two public hearings on