14.03.2015 Views

PUC Annual Report–Fiscal Year 2011-12 - Public Utilities Commission

PUC Annual Report–Fiscal Year 2011-12 - Public Utilities Commission

PUC Annual Report–Fiscal Year 2011-12 - Public Utilities Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Utilities</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> Report <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>12</strong><br />

State of Hawaii Page 39<br />

• MECO 20<strong>12</strong> Test <strong>Year</strong> Rate Increase Request—Docket No. <strong>2011</strong>-0092<br />

In July <strong>2011</strong>, MECO filed an application requesting a general rate increase<br />

of $27,523,000, or approximately 6.68 percent, based on a total estimated<br />

revenue requirement of $439,377,000 for the 20<strong>12</strong> test year. In addition to the<br />

rate increase, MECO proposes to establish a purchased power adjustment<br />

clause to recover non-energy purchased power cost, revise its ECAC tariff, and<br />

implement a change in accounting for administrative and general transfers to<br />

construction projects.<br />

In an order issued on May 21, 20<strong>12</strong>, the <strong>Commission</strong> approved an interim<br />

rate increase in revenues of $13,089,000 or approximately 3.16 percent based<br />

on a 20<strong>12</strong> test year. In this interim decision, the <strong>Commission</strong> also approved<br />

revisions to the ECAC, changes in accounting, and considered other MECO<br />

requests.<br />

• HELCO 2010 Test <strong>Year</strong> Rate Increase Request—Docket No. 2009-0164<br />

On December 9, 2009, HELCO filed an application requesting a general<br />

rate increase of $20,934,500 (approximately 6.0 percent) over its revenues at<br />

current effective rates. In addition, HELCO proposes to establish: (1) a<br />

purchased power adjustment clause/surcharge to recover non-energy purchased<br />

power agreement costs by effectively transferring the recovery of purchased<br />

power costs from base rates to the new surcharge that will be adjusted monthly<br />

and reconciled on a quarterly basis; and (2) a revenue balancing account for a<br />

revenue decoupling mechanism that will remove the linkage between electric<br />

revenues and sales, if such a revenue balancing account is not otherwise<br />

approved by the <strong>Commission</strong> in its separate revenue decoupling investigative<br />

proceeding, Docket No. 2008-0274.<br />

On November 3, 2010, the <strong>Commission</strong> issued its Interim Decision and<br />

Order, which approved an interim increase of $5,956,000 over revenues at<br />

present rates rather than the $20,934,500 that was requested in the application.<br />

In a Decision and Order issued on April 4, 20<strong>12</strong>, the <strong>Commission</strong> approved a<br />

rate increase of $4,494,000 over its revenues at current effective rates.<br />

• HELCO 2013 Test <strong>Year</strong> Rate Increase Request—Docket No. 20<strong>12</strong>-0099<br />

On August 16, 20<strong>12</strong>, HELCO filed an application requesting a general rate<br />

increase of $19,808,000 (approximately 4.2 percent) over its revenues at present<br />

rates. HELCO, as part of its overall request, also seeks the <strong>Commission</strong>'s<br />

approval of: (1) an interim increase in its revenues at present rates through an<br />

interim 2013 test year surcharge, pending the <strong>Commission</strong>'s issuance of its final<br />

decision; and (2) other requests that it proposes to take effect simultaneously<br />

with any interim increase in revenues that is approved by the commission,<br />

including: (A) certain accounting changes; (B) the re-setting of its target heat<br />

rates by fuel type and its loss factor to 2013 test year levels for the purpose of<br />

calculating its existing energy cost adjustment clause; and (C) changes in the<br />

monthly allocation factors and the basis for these factors in the revenue<br />

balancing account provision of its existing revenue decoupling mechanism. On<br />

October 29 and October 30, 20<strong>12</strong>, the <strong>Commission</strong> held two public hearings on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!