15.11.2012 Views

Global Players from Emerging Markets: Strengthening ... - Unctad

Global Players from Emerging Markets: Strengthening ... - Unctad

Global Players from Emerging Markets: Strengthening ... - Unctad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 3. Top 20 Chinese Overseas Investors, by FDI stock, 2003<br />

Foreign Owned Enterprises<br />

5%<br />

State Owned Enterprises<br />

43%<br />

Other<br />

1%<br />

Collectively Owned<br />

Enterprises<br />

2%<br />

Source: China, Ministry of Commerce.<br />

is at an early stage, and that too much should not be<br />

made of short-term trends, these figures suggest that<br />

securing raw materials and other resources is a very<br />

major part of the FDI effort by its enterprises.<br />

Types of enterprises. Between 1979 and 1985,<br />

Chinese OFDI approvals were tightly controlled and<br />

largely undertaken by state-owned enterprises (SOEs),<br />

including provincial and municipal corporations.<br />

Trade relations and expanding China’s influence were<br />

the guiding principles behind this early investment.<br />

After 1985, non-state-owned firms were allowed<br />

to apply for approval to invest overseas, especially<br />

for manufacturing and to access foreign markets.<br />

Between 1992 and 1998 there was a rapid increase in<br />

OFDI by SOEs, including provincial and municipal<br />

corporations, both in and via Hong Kong (China). This<br />

led to a tightening-up of approval procedures in order<br />

to better manage the process. Since 1998, however,<br />

the authorities have actively encouraged OFDI, both<br />

to secure key resources (including raw materials and<br />

technology) and establish “global” Chinese TNCs as<br />

part of a strategy of creating national champions in<br />

the face of formidable competition <strong>from</strong> existing non-<br />

Chinese TNCs, within and without China. Though<br />

this latest phase is relatively new – and all OFDI is<br />

subject to government approval – some commentators<br />

regard the post 1998 period as an “acceleration stage”<br />

in Chinese OFDI. 27 The data suggest some merit to<br />

this view (box 1). 28<br />

27 John Child and Suzana B. Rodrigues 2005, “The<br />

Internationalization of Chinese Firms: A Case for Theoretical<br />

Extension?”, Management and Organization Review, Vol. 1, No<br />

3; and Douglas H. Brooks and Hafiz Mirza (2005), “Outward FDI<br />

<strong>from</strong> Developing Asia”, paper presented at the Asian Development<br />

Bank seminar, “Outward Foreign Direct Investment <strong>from</strong> Asian<br />

Developing Countries”, Bangkok, 28-29 November.<br />

28 For further discussion, including various nuances of Government<br />

policy towards OFDI, see John Wong and Sarah Chan (2003),<br />

“China’s Outward Direct Investment: Expanding Worldwide”,<br />

China: An International Journal, Vol 1, No 2; Dexin Yang<br />

(2003), Foreign Direct Investment <strong>from</strong> Developing Countries: A<br />

Hong Kong (China)<br />

& Macau(China)<br />

Private Companies<br />

2%<br />

10%<br />

Holding Companies<br />

4%<br />

Limited Holding Companies<br />

11%<br />

Limited Companies<br />

22%<br />

CHAPTER V 51<br />

Characteristics of China’s Transnational<br />

Enterprises. Some 43 per cent of all Chinese outward<br />

foreign investors in 2003 were state-owned enterprises<br />

and, leaving aside “Hong Kong (China) and Macau<br />

(China)” and “Foreign Owned Enterprises” 29 , the<br />

remaining investors are a mixed bag of private,<br />

limited, holding and collectively owned companies<br />

(figure 3). Most are large companies, working closely<br />

with the state and, therefore, likely to pursue OFDI in<br />

accordance with at least some of the priorities of the<br />

Government. As mentioned earlier, smaller, private<br />

companies are unlikely to be captured by either<br />

MOFCOM or SAFE data.<br />

Looking at specific companies, tables 3 to 5<br />

provide insight on the nature of the largest Chinese<br />

TNCs. Although there is a slight variation in terms<br />

of which TNCs appear in these tables (since these<br />

relate to the ranking of companies in FDI stock,<br />

revenues and assets overseas), the vast majority<br />

are state-owned enterprises. In consequence, the<br />

largest sectors or industries represented by these<br />

large TNCs are resource/raw materials orientated<br />

companies (e.g. China Petroleum & Natural Gas,<br />

China Ocean Petroleum, China Resources and China<br />

MinMetal Corporation; it is likely that some of the<br />

holding companies are parents to similar companies),<br />

transport and communication to handle imports and<br />

exports (e.g. China Airline, China Shipping and China<br />

Foreign Trade Shipping Corporation), Heavy Industry<br />

(e.g. China Construction Engineering Corporation<br />

and China Bao Steel) and the Information Technology<br />

and Electrical/Electronic industry (e.g. China Mobile,<br />

China Telecom and China Electric). It is only in this<br />

last sector that a few private companies (e.g. Huawei<br />

Case Study of China’s Outward Investment, Centre for Strategic<br />

Economic Studies, University of Melbourne, unpublished thesis;<br />

UNCTAD (2004), “China: An <strong>Emerging</strong> FDI Outward Investor”,<br />

e-brief, United Nations, New York and Geneva.<br />

29 Presumably establishing grandchildren subsidiaries in third<br />

countries.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!