Global Players from Emerging Markets: Strengthening ... - Unctad
Global Players from Emerging Markets: Strengthening ... - Unctad
Global Players from Emerging Markets: Strengthening ... - Unctad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 3. Top 20 Chinese Overseas Investors, by FDI stock, 2003<br />
Foreign Owned Enterprises<br />
5%<br />
State Owned Enterprises<br />
43%<br />
Other<br />
1%<br />
Collectively Owned<br />
Enterprises<br />
2%<br />
Source: China, Ministry of Commerce.<br />
is at an early stage, and that too much should not be<br />
made of short-term trends, these figures suggest that<br />
securing raw materials and other resources is a very<br />
major part of the FDI effort by its enterprises.<br />
Types of enterprises. Between 1979 and 1985,<br />
Chinese OFDI approvals were tightly controlled and<br />
largely undertaken by state-owned enterprises (SOEs),<br />
including provincial and municipal corporations.<br />
Trade relations and expanding China’s influence were<br />
the guiding principles behind this early investment.<br />
After 1985, non-state-owned firms were allowed<br />
to apply for approval to invest overseas, especially<br />
for manufacturing and to access foreign markets.<br />
Between 1992 and 1998 there was a rapid increase in<br />
OFDI by SOEs, including provincial and municipal<br />
corporations, both in and via Hong Kong (China). This<br />
led to a tightening-up of approval procedures in order<br />
to better manage the process. Since 1998, however,<br />
the authorities have actively encouraged OFDI, both<br />
to secure key resources (including raw materials and<br />
technology) and establish “global” Chinese TNCs as<br />
part of a strategy of creating national champions in<br />
the face of formidable competition <strong>from</strong> existing non-<br />
Chinese TNCs, within and without China. Though<br />
this latest phase is relatively new – and all OFDI is<br />
subject to government approval – some commentators<br />
regard the post 1998 period as an “acceleration stage”<br />
in Chinese OFDI. 27 The data suggest some merit to<br />
this view (box 1). 28<br />
27 John Child and Suzana B. Rodrigues 2005, “The<br />
Internationalization of Chinese Firms: A Case for Theoretical<br />
Extension?”, Management and Organization Review, Vol. 1, No<br />
3; and Douglas H. Brooks and Hafiz Mirza (2005), “Outward FDI<br />
<strong>from</strong> Developing Asia”, paper presented at the Asian Development<br />
Bank seminar, “Outward Foreign Direct Investment <strong>from</strong> Asian<br />
Developing Countries”, Bangkok, 28-29 November.<br />
28 For further discussion, including various nuances of Government<br />
policy towards OFDI, see John Wong and Sarah Chan (2003),<br />
“China’s Outward Direct Investment: Expanding Worldwide”,<br />
China: An International Journal, Vol 1, No 2; Dexin Yang<br />
(2003), Foreign Direct Investment <strong>from</strong> Developing Countries: A<br />
Hong Kong (China)<br />
& Macau(China)<br />
Private Companies<br />
2%<br />
10%<br />
Holding Companies<br />
4%<br />
Limited Holding Companies<br />
11%<br />
Limited Companies<br />
22%<br />
CHAPTER V 51<br />
Characteristics of China’s Transnational<br />
Enterprises. Some 43 per cent of all Chinese outward<br />
foreign investors in 2003 were state-owned enterprises<br />
and, leaving aside “Hong Kong (China) and Macau<br />
(China)” and “Foreign Owned Enterprises” 29 , the<br />
remaining investors are a mixed bag of private,<br />
limited, holding and collectively owned companies<br />
(figure 3). Most are large companies, working closely<br />
with the state and, therefore, likely to pursue OFDI in<br />
accordance with at least some of the priorities of the<br />
Government. As mentioned earlier, smaller, private<br />
companies are unlikely to be captured by either<br />
MOFCOM or SAFE data.<br />
Looking at specific companies, tables 3 to 5<br />
provide insight on the nature of the largest Chinese<br />
TNCs. Although there is a slight variation in terms<br />
of which TNCs appear in these tables (since these<br />
relate to the ranking of companies in FDI stock,<br />
revenues and assets overseas), the vast majority<br />
are state-owned enterprises. In consequence, the<br />
largest sectors or industries represented by these<br />
large TNCs are resource/raw materials orientated<br />
companies (e.g. China Petroleum & Natural Gas,<br />
China Ocean Petroleum, China Resources and China<br />
MinMetal Corporation; it is likely that some of the<br />
holding companies are parents to similar companies),<br />
transport and communication to handle imports and<br />
exports (e.g. China Airline, China Shipping and China<br />
Foreign Trade Shipping Corporation), Heavy Industry<br />
(e.g. China Construction Engineering Corporation<br />
and China Bao Steel) and the Information Technology<br />
and Electrical/Electronic industry (e.g. China Mobile,<br />
China Telecom and China Electric). It is only in this<br />
last sector that a few private companies (e.g. Huawei<br />
Case Study of China’s Outward Investment, Centre for Strategic<br />
Economic Studies, University of Melbourne, unpublished thesis;<br />
UNCTAD (2004), “China: An <strong>Emerging</strong> FDI Outward Investor”,<br />
e-brief, United Nations, New York and Geneva.<br />
29 Presumably establishing grandchildren subsidiaries in third<br />
countries.