Digesting Jung: Food for the Journey - Inner City Books
Digesting Jung: Food for the Journey - Inner City Books
Digesting Jung: Food for the Journey - Inner City Books
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
68 Toge<strong>the</strong>rness vs. Intimacy with Distance<br />
I say, “Of course it is most regrettable that you always get into trouble,<br />
but don’t you see what you are doing? You love somebody, you<br />
identify with <strong>the</strong>m, and of course you prevail against <strong>the</strong> objects of<br />
your love and repress <strong>the</strong>m by your very self-evident identity. You<br />
handle <strong>the</strong>m as if <strong>the</strong>y were yourself, and naturally <strong>the</strong>re will be resistances.<br />
It is a violation of <strong>the</strong> individuality of those people, and it<br />
is a sin against your own individuality. Those resistances are a most<br />
useful and important instinct: you have resistances, scenes, and disappointments<br />
so that you may become finally conscious of yourself,<br />
and <strong>the</strong>n hatred is no more.” 58<br />
Individuation, finding your own unique path, requires a focus on<br />
<strong>the</strong> inner axis, ego to unconscious—getting to know yourself. The<br />
ideal of toge<strong>the</strong>rness lets you off that hook. Toge<strong>the</strong>rness doesn’t<br />
acknowledge <strong>the</strong> natural boundaries between people, and it gives<br />
short shrift to <strong>the</strong>ir differences. All you’re left with is unconscious<br />
identity. When you are on <strong>the</strong> path of individuation, focused on<br />
your own psychological development, you relate to o<strong>the</strong>rs from a<br />
position of personal integrity. This is <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>for</strong> intimacy with<br />
distance. It is not as sentimental as toge<strong>the</strong>rness, but it’s not as<br />
sticky ei<strong>the</strong>r.<br />
A relationship based on intimacy with distance does not require<br />
separate living quarters. Intimacy with distance means psychological<br />
separation, which comes about through <strong>the</strong> process of differentiation—knowing<br />
where you end and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r begins. Intimacy<br />
with distance can be as close and as warm as you want, and<br />
it’s psychologically clean. Toge<strong>the</strong>rness is simply fusion, <strong>the</strong> submersion<br />
of two individualities into one, variously called symbiosis,<br />
identification, participation mystique. It can feel good <strong>for</strong> a while<br />
but in <strong>the</strong> long run it does not work.<br />
Toge<strong>the</strong>rness is to intimacy with distance as being in love is to<br />
loving. When you’re in love, you absolutely need <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. This is<br />
symptomatic of bonding, which is natural between parent and infant,<br />
and also at <strong>the</strong> beginning of any relationship at any age. But<br />
58 The Psychology of Kundalini Yoga, p. 7.