15.11.2012 Views

Digesting Jung: Food for the Journey - Inner City Books

Digesting Jung: Food for the Journey - Inner City Books

Digesting Jung: Food for the Journey - Inner City Books

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

68 Toge<strong>the</strong>rness vs. Intimacy with Distance<br />

I say, “Of course it is most regrettable that you always get into trouble,<br />

but don’t you see what you are doing? You love somebody, you<br />

identify with <strong>the</strong>m, and of course you prevail against <strong>the</strong> objects of<br />

your love and repress <strong>the</strong>m by your very self-evident identity. You<br />

handle <strong>the</strong>m as if <strong>the</strong>y were yourself, and naturally <strong>the</strong>re will be resistances.<br />

It is a violation of <strong>the</strong> individuality of those people, and it<br />

is a sin against your own individuality. Those resistances are a most<br />

useful and important instinct: you have resistances, scenes, and disappointments<br />

so that you may become finally conscious of yourself,<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n hatred is no more.” 58<br />

Individuation, finding your own unique path, requires a focus on<br />

<strong>the</strong> inner axis, ego to unconscious—getting to know yourself. The<br />

ideal of toge<strong>the</strong>rness lets you off that hook. Toge<strong>the</strong>rness doesn’t<br />

acknowledge <strong>the</strong> natural boundaries between people, and it gives<br />

short shrift to <strong>the</strong>ir differences. All you’re left with is unconscious<br />

identity. When you are on <strong>the</strong> path of individuation, focused on<br />

your own psychological development, you relate to o<strong>the</strong>rs from a<br />

position of personal integrity. This is <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>for</strong> intimacy with<br />

distance. It is not as sentimental as toge<strong>the</strong>rness, but it’s not as<br />

sticky ei<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

A relationship based on intimacy with distance does not require<br />

separate living quarters. Intimacy with distance means psychological<br />

separation, which comes about through <strong>the</strong> process of differentiation—knowing<br />

where you end and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r begins. Intimacy<br />

with distance can be as close and as warm as you want, and<br />

it’s psychologically clean. Toge<strong>the</strong>rness is simply fusion, <strong>the</strong> submersion<br />

of two individualities into one, variously called symbiosis,<br />

identification, participation mystique. It can feel good <strong>for</strong> a while<br />

but in <strong>the</strong> long run it does not work.<br />

Toge<strong>the</strong>rness is to intimacy with distance as being in love is to<br />

loving. When you’re in love, you absolutely need <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. This is<br />

symptomatic of bonding, which is natural between parent and infant,<br />

and also at <strong>the</strong> beginning of any relationship at any age. But<br />

58 The Psychology of Kundalini Yoga, p. 7.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!