The Inflation Cycle of 2002 to 2015 - Uhlmann Price Securities
The Inflation Cycle of 2002 to 2015 - Uhlmann Price Securities
The Inflation Cycle of 2002 to 2015 - Uhlmann Price Securities
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Industrial Portfolio Strategy<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Inflation</strong> <strong>Cycle</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>2002</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>2015</strong> ⎯ April 19, <strong>2002</strong> -24- Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Structure <strong>of</strong> This Report<br />
This report is constructed as a probability array <strong>of</strong> expected values, based on what we believe are the<br />
three most plausible <strong>2002</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>2015</strong> outcomes; we use his<strong>to</strong>rical precedent as the “effect,” and our objective<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> the facts presented in the remainder <strong>of</strong> this report as the “cause.” For a long period<br />
such as <strong>2002</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>2015</strong>, we would expect some combination <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>ten mutually exclusive events we<br />
cite, so a probability-weighted analysis seems the best approach, in our view. <strong>The</strong> scenarios we describe are<br />
as follows.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Scenario (1) Continued deflation and a continuation <strong>of</strong> the western-dominated status quo, <strong>to</strong> include<br />
the (technology) capital spending boom and sustained, double-digit U.S. equity bull market returns in<br />
the <strong>2002</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>2015</strong> period. (Probability 15%)<br />
Scenario (2) Rapid developing country modernization, combined with synchronous G-7 economic recovery,<br />
leading <strong>to</strong> a sustained boom in commodity demand relative <strong>to</strong> more inelastic supply. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />
the potential for Persian Gulf conflict that may periodically constrict supply, further tilting the supply/<br />
demand equation in favor <strong>of</strong> commodity inflation in the <strong>2002</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>2015</strong> period. (Probability 60%)<br />
Scenario (3) Middle East war(s) that result in large oil supply disruptions. Because major wars produce<br />
high inflation and low real s<strong>to</strong>ck price gains, and even minor wars can interrupt trade, we devote a<br />
section <strong>of</strong> this report <strong>to</strong> analyzing the potential for conflict in the Persian Gulf. (Probability 25%)<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> this probability matrix, for the period <strong>2002</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>2015</strong>, we see the PPI All Commodities as<br />
outpacing the price return <strong>of</strong> the broad U.S. s<strong>to</strong>ck market (S&P 500) index, and we expect gradually<br />
rising CPI inflation. As Exhibit 17 shows, we expect the following:<br />
• 6.1% CAGR for the PPI commodities (back-half higher),<br />
• 4.4% price only CAGR for the U.S. s<strong>to</strong>ck market (front-half higher),<br />
• 5.4% CAGR for consumer price inflation (back-half higher), and<br />
• CPI-urban inflation cresting at a rate <strong>of</strong> almost 8% late in the <strong>2002</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>2015</strong> period.<br />
This is not a forecast for specific years, in which leadership may alternate from one year <strong>to</strong> the next, but<br />
rather, it is a full-cycle view meant <strong>to</strong> position long-term inves<strong>to</strong>rs, as well as guide short-term inves<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
who may employ a trading discipline. His<strong>to</strong>ry and probability assessments based on current events are imperfect<br />
as forecasting <strong>to</strong>ols, but using the <strong>to</strong>ols <strong>to</strong> the best <strong>of</strong> our ability is our purpose as an analyst. Our<br />
report concludes that Caterpillar, Deere, and Joy Global would be beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> the environment<br />
we foresee <strong>to</strong> <strong>2015</strong>, which is a marked change from the environment <strong>of</strong> the last two decades.