27.04.2015 Views

Architect Drawings : A Selection of Sketches by World Famous Architects Through History

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Latrobe, Benjamin Henry (1764–1820)<br />

US Capitol under construction, seventh set, Maryland Historical Society,<br />

1960.108.1.9.12, August 1806<br />

Benjamin Henry Latrobe introduced the United States to a neoclassical language for monumental<br />

building. Born in 1764, in Yorkshire, England, he received a classical education. He attended the<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Leipzig and subsequently traveled throughout the continent, especially in Italy and<br />

France. Upon his return to England, he continued his education with the engineer John Smeaton and,<br />

later, in an architectural apprenticeship with Samuel Pepys Cockerell. With family connections in the<br />

United States, he initially moved to Virginia. Latrobe’s first projects in the United States included the<br />

Bank <strong>of</strong> Philadelphia, a Greek revival structure; Sedgeley, a gothic revival house built in 1799; and<br />

engineering projects such as the Philadelphia Waterworks pumping station with its strong reference to<br />

Ledoux.<br />

Latrobe relocated his practice to Philadelphia and other projects ensued such as the United States<br />

Customs House in 1807–1809 and Baltimore Cathedral from 1804 to 1808. As surveyor <strong>of</strong> public<br />

buildings, his most prominent and influential building came with the opportunity to design the<br />

Capitol building in Washington, DC. He designed a suitably imposing Pantheon-domed structure<br />

with alternating pilasters and windows, a rusticated lower level, and a Roman/Greek temple entrance<br />

(Norton, 1977). Sustaining a dialogue with Thomas Jefferson, he also contemplated appropriate architecture<br />

for America’s emerging political system. He was prepared, with his knowledge <strong>of</strong> historical<br />

revival in Greek, Roman, and gothic styles, at a time when the United States needed public and political<br />

identity and was searching for symbols in the form <strong>of</strong> monuments.<br />

Latrobe was deemed a skilled draughtsman, clearly able to explain his ideas visually (Van Vynckt,<br />

1993). He constantly carried a sketchbook to record his travels, <strong>of</strong>ten rendering scenes in watercolor.<br />

This image from a sketchbook (Figure 3.4) may have been a travel companion, but it displays the<br />

Capitol building under construction. Delineated with a light hand, it appears brief and unfinished.<br />

Interestingly, the sketch remains less finished where the building appears less complete. Details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

completed section have been rendered darker and with more precision. Sketchy stacks <strong>of</strong> building<br />

materials, wagons, and temporary tents appear in front <strong>of</strong> the structure. The sketch contains mostly<br />

single lines and describes little context, barring a few brief trees and shrubs in the foreground.<br />

With Latrobe’s habit <strong>of</strong> carrying a sketchbook, the question arises <strong>of</strong> why architects draw when<br />

traveling. They may feel a need to capture a scene as a memory device, or perhaps they wish to analyze<br />

an element that is foreign to their experience. Curiously, Latrobe was sketching his own building<br />

during construction. One can speculate that he viewed the sketch as an architect’s analysis,<br />

contemplating how the project was progressing. He may have used the sketch as part <strong>of</strong> a job survey<br />

or as a way to oversee the project’s construction. Possibly divided between his roles as construction<br />

supervisor and detached observer, he may have absent-mindedly sketched during a free moment.<br />

This project, being unarguably his most identifying and most time consuming work, was likely a<br />

source <strong>of</strong> great pride. Consequently, the sketch may have been produced to record its emerging<br />

form. It also may represent his habitual technique <strong>of</strong> observation; a situation where Latrobe was<br />

unable to understand the building without drawing.<br />

Since Latrobe was spending most <strong>of</strong> his time at his practice in Philadelphia, his intent may have<br />

been to carry the progress home for his own recollection or to inform someone else – the invention<br />

<strong>of</strong> the photograph was still several years in the future.<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!