11.05.2015 Views

FinPilot2 Final Report – User Acceptance of Mobile TV Services ...

FinPilot2 Final Report – User Acceptance of Mobile TV Services ...

FinPilot2 Final Report – User Acceptance of Mobile TV Services ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 Related Research<br />

2.1 FinPilot in 2005<br />

2.1.1 Setup <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

The original FinPilot or the Finnish DVB-H trial was carried out in 2005 and it was<br />

organised by the partners <strong>of</strong> Finnish <strong>Mobile</strong> <strong>TV</strong> Pilot: Digita, M<strong>TV</strong> Media, Nelonen,<br />

YLE, Elisa, TeliaSonera and Nokia (Mäki, 2005; Internal FinPilot1 results report)<br />

A sample <strong>of</strong> 500 test users was recruited from a random selection <strong>of</strong> operators’<br />

customers. The sample represented both sexes (35% women) and age groups<br />

18-70 (47% age 18-30). Nokia 7710 smart phones were used as test devices and<br />

broadcasting covered the Helsinki metropolitan area. Pilot users paid a monthly<br />

access fee (4,9 e) for basic services and separate fees (3,9 e for the first month,<br />

later included in the basic fee) for additional channels and special events such as<br />

Formula weekends. The users received phones from the mobile <strong>TV</strong> pilot project but<br />

were using their own subscriptions.<br />

The piloting was carried out by Research International Finland and Finnpanel during<br />

March-June 2005. Surveys were organised before the trial, after 1-2 weeks usage<br />

and after 3 months usage. Focus group interviews were organised in parallel to the<br />

surveys.<br />

2.1.2 Results<br />

The main result was that mobile <strong>TV</strong> service was considered to have future potential,<br />

assuming that pricing and content are in line with consumers’ expectations and<br />

needs. Of the pilot participants surveyed, 58% thought that mobile <strong>TV</strong> will become<br />

popular in the future. Requirements for mobile <strong>TV</strong> adoption included handset<br />

usability and acceptance, technical performance and reliability, usability <strong>of</strong> mobile<br />

<strong>TV</strong> service and content that suits irregular and short viewing periods.<br />

The main usage motivations were to pass time and to stay updated. The main usage<br />

contexts were at home alone, at work and while travelling on public transportation.<br />

Short and easy to follow content was preferred for travelling whereas at home<br />

mobile <strong>TV</strong> could be used as a secondary <strong>TV</strong> when the main <strong>TV</strong> was in use by others<br />

or before going to sleep. At work mobile <strong>TV</strong> took to a great extent the role <strong>of</strong> a<br />

radio; it was used as background entertainment.<br />

<strong>Mobile</strong> <strong>TV</strong> usage was more spontaneous than normal <strong>TV</strong> viewing: mobile <strong>TV</strong><br />

was watched when time and the situation allowed. After the initial enthusiasm<br />

<strong>TV</strong> viewing became refined to certain moments, certain channels and certain<br />

programme formats. Of the sample surveyed, 65-70% was using mobile <strong>TV</strong> on a<br />

weekly basis. Active users (100 users) were watching mobile <strong>TV</strong> twice a week, 30-40<br />

min per session and “light users” (100 users) once a week, 10 minutes per session.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!