11.05.2015 Views

FinPilot2 Final Report – User Acceptance of Mobile TV Services ...

FinPilot2 Final Report – User Acceptance of Mobile TV Services ...

FinPilot2 Final Report – User Acceptance of Mobile TV Services ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Most panellists also gave good scores for ease <strong>of</strong> use, reliability and appearance.<br />

In the written comments the panellists pointed out problems in waiting for<br />

downloads. The panellists would have liked to get information on the size <strong>of</strong> the<br />

video before starting downloads both because <strong>of</strong> the time involved to download<br />

and because they wanted to control the amount <strong>of</strong> data transferred due to costs.<br />

As they had to download the whole video even if they just glanced it, they thought<br />

that the service did not encourage trying out content. The panellists also would<br />

have liked to get more information about the programme before starting the<br />

download.<br />

“Length <strong>of</strong> the videos should definitely be shown! Also more description <strong>of</strong> the content so<br />

that you do not need to select blindfolded.”<br />

Video and sound quality was assessed quite good, on the scale 1-5, 76% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

panellists assessed video quality 3 or more and 82% assessed sound quality 3 or<br />

more. Occasional problems were faced with videos freezing, batteries drying out,<br />

and successfully downloading some videos.<br />

Most negative scores were related to the content that was not found to be<br />

especially useful or entertaining. The panellists also doubted the reliability <strong>of</strong><br />

the information provided via the videos. The panellists were asked to assess how<br />

interesting they considered individual videos that were available in M2Hz. From<br />

the selection <strong>of</strong> 12 programmes, only three programmes had been watched by more<br />

than half <strong>of</strong> the respondents. It seems that the link titles were not very descriptive:<br />

the most-watched programmes seemed to include the most descriptive titles<br />

(Tapahtumien kaupunki (City <strong>of</strong> Events), Kaupunkikuva (Views <strong>of</strong> the city), Kallio<br />

kukkii (Kallio flourishes). The least watched programmes included the most obscure<br />

titles (Saur<strong>of</strong>onia, Pirtola, MUNDO:Digitales). However, almost all programmes<br />

found audience that considered the programme interesting. Only one <strong>of</strong> the 12<br />

programmes had no grades over 2 on the scale 1-5 and 9 programmes had at least<br />

one 4-5 grade.<br />

”On one hand, content produced by these kinds <strong>of</strong> smaller groups is a good idea, but I was not<br />

interested in these clips.”<br />

“For a person who needs this kind <strong>of</strong> service, and for elderly people certainly a very useful<br />

service.”<br />

In the written comments most panellists told that they would like to see more<br />

videos <strong>of</strong> current local events. Also information about local attractions, districts,<br />

and local politics as well as the history <strong>of</strong> the city were suggested as interesting<br />

content.<br />

“Info channel type <strong>of</strong> services: tourism, events, schedules, topical local issues.”<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!