16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This scepticism focused not on the effectiveness or the safety <strong>of</strong> the vaccine but rather<br />

on the fact that by the 1960s there were not enough new cases being revealed to<br />

justify the expense and coverage <strong>of</strong> BCG programme currently in place in schools,<br />

even though it was now only applicable to North Island schools. <strong>The</strong> debate however,<br />

remained within the medical arena and was not shared by the public, most <strong>of</strong> whom<br />

consented for their children to receive BCG. In 1963, 34,621 doses <strong>of</strong> vaccine were<br />

given, mainly to secondary school children. 197 In 1968, 32,137 children aged 13 to 14<br />

received a BCG. 198 <strong>The</strong>se figures remained constant into the 1970s.<br />

Conclusion<br />

From 1941 to 1962 the vaccines routinely available for children had increased from<br />

one (or two for Maori) at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the period to five. This had necessitated<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> guidelines and eventually a schedule <strong>of</strong> immunisation by the<br />

Department to assist both doctors and parents in achieving the required number <strong>of</strong><br />

immunisations at the correct time. This effectively transferred control <strong>of</strong> these<br />

decisions away from the doctor and over to the Health Department. 199<br />

Changing ideas regarding the authority <strong>of</strong> science, the growth <strong>of</strong> medical<br />

specialisation as well as an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> vaccines facilitated the use <strong>of</strong><br />

expert advice over and above that available within the Health Department. <strong>The</strong> WHO<br />

exerted great influence over immunisation procedure and policy development in New<br />

Zealand with the Health Department committed to undertaking active roles within the<br />

WHO itself. <strong>The</strong> EAC, as New Zealand’s panel <strong>of</strong> experts, now guided immunisation<br />

policy by making recommendations to the Health Department. Essential decision-<br />

making was therefore, during this period, shifted away from the Department and into<br />

the hands <strong>of</strong> specialists; aspects <strong>of</strong> Health Department immunisation policy would<br />

now be determined by experts outside <strong>of</strong> the Department and even outside New<br />

Zealand.<br />

197<br />

AJHR, 1964, H-31, p.56.<br />

198<br />

AJHR, 1969, H-31, p.16. <strong>The</strong>se figures do not include those who were found to already have<br />

immunity to the disease.<br />

199<br />

Typhoid immunisations were given to Maori only and will be dealt with in the next chapter. Polio<br />

immunisation will be discussed in Chapter 5.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!