16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

demonstrated that no departmental changes to policy would be made unless the expert<br />

committee recommended it. 35<br />

By the end <strong>of</strong> the 1970s there were growing concerns regarding a worldwide rubella<br />

epidemic and its implications for the unborn babies <strong>of</strong> New Zealand. This epidemic<br />

spanned 20 months from October 1979 to May 1981. 36 Unfortunately for the Health<br />

Department, the onset <strong>of</strong> this epidemic led to criticism <strong>of</strong> its new policy by groups<br />

who still advocated immunising preschoolers. Paediatrician Ian Hassall, Director <strong>of</strong><br />

Medical Services for Plunket, indicated that ‘immunisation <strong>of</strong> 11 year olds begun in<br />

1979, although soundly based in my opinion, will have no effect on the course <strong>of</strong> the<br />

present epidemic’ and requested a mass immunisation campaign <strong>of</strong> all schoolchildren<br />

for the start <strong>of</strong> school year in 1981. 37 <strong>The</strong> New Zealand College <strong>of</strong> General<br />

Practitioners also requested a one week campaign for February 1981 to immunise all<br />

women and children over 12 months <strong>of</strong> age. 38 <strong>The</strong> New Zealand Federation for Deaf<br />

Children requested the Department to stop the current practice <strong>of</strong> immunising<br />

adolescent girls and ‘revert to its former policy <strong>of</strong> immunising all children in the pre-<br />

school years’. 39 <strong>The</strong> Otago Daily Times also entered the fray, expressing its views in<br />

an article entitled ‘Criticism <strong>of</strong> Rubella Immunisation Policy’. 40 This commented on<br />

the ‘obvious lack <strong>of</strong> success that had accompanied the change in policy’ and<br />

advocated introducing school-based rubella immunisation at the primary school<br />

level. 41<br />

In light <strong>of</strong> this discouragement the EAC once again reviewed rubella policy in March<br />

1981 and recommended its continuation as it was achieving high levels <strong>of</strong> acceptance<br />

amongst Form 1 girls, much more so than under the 1970s policy <strong>of</strong> immunising<br />

35<br />

<strong>The</strong> Epidemiology Advisory Committee (EAC) became the Communicable Disease Control<br />

Advisory Committee (CDCAC) in January 1985.<br />

36<br />

J. Miller, N. S. Kuttner, Y. E. Hermon, ‘<strong>The</strong> 1980 rubella outbreak in New Zealand’, New Zealand<br />

Medical Journal (NZMJ), 9 June, 1982, p. 386.<br />

37<br />

I. B. Hassall to G. Gair, 18 December 1980, ABQU 632 W4415/266 51380 131/18/1 ANZ,<br />

Wellington.<br />

38<br />

I. St George and J. Moody to G. Gair, 16 December 1980, ABQU 632 W4415/266 51380 131/18/1,<br />

ANZ, Wellington. It should be noted that the decision taken to immunise children was not unanimous,<br />

two doctors on the committee dissented.<br />

39<br />

M. Gunn to R. D. Muldoon, 18 December 1980, ABQU 632 W4415/266 51380 131/18/1, ANZ,<br />

Wellington.<br />

40 ODT, 15 December 1980.<br />

41 ibid.<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!