16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

One <strong>of</strong> the reasons for this was the substantial publicity campaign undertaken by the<br />

Department. <strong>The</strong>re were articles in newspapers and a feature in the New Zealand<br />

Woman’s Weekly expounding the community benefits <strong>of</strong> the immunisation. 86 <strong>The</strong><br />

newspapers had also recently featured the political debates and manoeuvrings over<br />

funding for the immunisation programme which had also brought the proposed<br />

campaign to the notice <strong>of</strong> the public. In addition, as part <strong>of</strong> the Department’s<br />

publicity campaign, a film was screened on television by the New Zealand<br />

Broadcasting Company in the early evening <strong>of</strong> 11 August called <strong>The</strong> Case against<br />

Rubella. 87 <strong>The</strong> Health Department found that whilst ‘prepared statements were<br />

published infrequently, the creation <strong>of</strong> a “newsy” situation allowed easy dissemination<br />

<strong>of</strong> information to the public’. 88 For instance, the televising <strong>of</strong> the departure <strong>of</strong><br />

immunisation teams by amphibian aircraft to some <strong>of</strong> the outlying coastal islands, on<br />

the day before the school campaign commenced, ‘created a favourable response and a<br />

great deal <strong>of</strong> public interest’. 89<br />

It was likely that this publicity made parents more aware <strong>of</strong> the rubella vaccine and<br />

the impending school campaign and may have induced parents to give their<br />

permission. In the <strong>Auckland</strong> District, <strong>of</strong> 29,919 children eligible, 25,254 were<br />

immunised against rubella. 90 <strong>The</strong> Deputy Medical Officer <strong>of</strong> Health for <strong>Auckland</strong>, T.<br />

H. Bierre, observed that the ‘convenience <strong>of</strong> vaccination at school appealed to the<br />

public, and is in New Zealand now a widely accepted procedure, following on earlier<br />

similar programmes’. 91 School-based campaigns were always popular with parents<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the ease with which their children could be immunised - all they had to do<br />

was sign a consent form.<br />

Nonetheless, preschoolers aged four and adult women were also part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

programme and the Department found that uptake for both these groups was ‘much<br />

less than anticipated’. 92 It was discovered that vaccine usage had only been 30<br />

86<br />

B. Young, ‘Blitzkrieg in the war against Measles’ New Zealand Woman’s Weekly, 13 July 1970,<br />

p.22, Evening Post (EP), 27 July 1970, EP, 29 July 1970.<br />

87<br />

‘Rubella Progress Report, 31 July 1970, H1 144/18/1 36182, ANZ, Wellington.<br />

88<br />

T. H. Bierre, ‘Immunisation <strong>of</strong> School Children with Rubella Vaccine’, NZMJ, 74, 8, 1971, p.9.<br />

89<br />

ibid.<br />

90<br />

ibid.<br />

91<br />

ibid., p.11.<br />

92<br />

‘Rubella Vaccine Usage’ 2 March 1971, H1 144/18/1 36182 ANZ, Wellington.<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!