16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

debates in medical circles surrounding the rubella immunisation policy, and<br />

enthusiasm for it amongst parents was fairly low. Figures also varied considerably<br />

between health districts. In 1973 it was found that in the Dunedin Health District 61.9<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> new school entrants were immunised against rubella. 10 In contrast, the<br />

Medical Officer <strong>of</strong> Health for Lower Hutt, James Ramsey, released figures in 1974<br />

showing only 15 percent <strong>of</strong> children in his district were immunised by age five. 11<br />

This low number was repeated in the Hamilton District where doctors claimed for<br />

only 1,020 rubella immunisations when over 5,000 children started school in 1974. 12<br />

After the initial success <strong>of</strong> the 1971 rubella campaign, which had a 95 percent<br />

acceptance rate, this was <strong>of</strong> grave concern to the Health Department. A strategy was<br />

put in place by the Department whereby children were given a rubella immunisation<br />

along with a booster shot <strong>of</strong> double vaccine just before they started school. This was<br />

a community measure designed to protect the unborn baby and as primary school<br />

children were perceived to be the largest reservoir <strong>of</strong> rubella infection the strategy was<br />

directed towards them. Almost immediately, the Health Department ran into<br />

difficulties. <strong>The</strong> problem was tw<strong>of</strong>old. Firstly, it was necessary to persuade parents<br />

to have their preschoolers immunised against a mild childhood illness for the benefit<br />

<strong>of</strong> the community, with little advantage for the child. Secondly, there was also some<br />

disagreement amongst members <strong>of</strong> the medical pr<strong>of</strong>ession over the policy adopted.<br />

Some medical practitioners believed it would be more effective to immunise girls at<br />

around age 11. 13<br />

To ensure the success <strong>of</strong> the policy the Health Department had to maintain rubella<br />

immunity levels at about 95 percent. Up until 1979 this was never achieved. <strong>The</strong><br />

controversy within the medical pr<strong>of</strong>ession regarding the rubella immunisation policy<br />

was a major reason for the low uptake, as doctors in turn influenced parents. A<br />

visiting American Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Paediatrics, Henry Kempe, from the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Colorado Medical Centre, Denver, spoke at the Paediatric Society Conference in<br />

October 1973. He stated that he felt it was ‘quite wrong’ to administer the vaccine to<br />

10<br />

‘Immunisation state <strong>of</strong> all new entrants to school in Dunedin Health District 1973’, AAFB 632<br />

W3463/83 47692 144/18/1, ANZ, Wellington.<br />

11<br />

New Zealand Herald (NZH), 30 July 1974.<br />

12<br />

Medical Officer <strong>of</strong> Health (MOH) Hamilton to Head Office, 3 February 1975, AAFB 632 W3463/83<br />

47692 144/18/1, ANZ, Wellington.<br />

13<br />

For a discussion on this policy see Chapter 6, pp.178-83.<br />

203

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!