16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

after World War Two, although during the 1930s parents received other information<br />

regarding health and nutrition for their children via pamphlets or radio talks. In terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> relative importance at this stage, there were other areas <strong>of</strong> childcare such as<br />

nutrition, hygiene and dental care that were seen as more <strong>of</strong> a priority to the<br />

Department, although the occasional radio talk and article in the newspapers did try to<br />

promote, with limited success, the message about diphtheria immunisation.<br />

Although about 11,500 children had been immunised at school by 1928, the<br />

Bundaberg tragedy in the same year had a huge impact on the immunisation<br />

programmes, determining their shape for the next ten to 15 years. At a point were the<br />

programme had just been expanded, all immunisations were halted for around a year.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fear engendered by Bundaberg within the public, and the caution exercised by the<br />

medical pr<strong>of</strong>ession and the Health Department, were in evidence throughout the<br />

1930s. As a result a piecemeal diphtheria immunisation programme was put in place<br />

during this decade which focused mainly on immunising schools where outbreaks <strong>of</strong><br />

the disease were occurring. Only two districts had introduced proactive immunisation<br />

programmes achieving around 50 percent coverage and were largely the results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

efforts <strong>of</strong> one Medical Officer <strong>of</strong> Health.<br />

In contrast to Canada and New York City, both <strong>of</strong> whom had substantial<br />

immunisation campaigns, New Zealand’s efforts looked meagre. However they were<br />

comparable with both Britain and Australia (whose public confidence was also<br />

seriously damaged by the Bundaberg disaster) and New Zealand followed Britain’s<br />

lead in introducing a national immunisation programme in 1941. Lack <strong>of</strong> staffing and<br />

resources also precluded the introduction <strong>of</strong> a programme on Canadian or American<br />

lines.<br />

Typhoid immunisations were confined to Maori to try and combat the high levels <strong>of</strong><br />

typhoid present in their communities. <strong>The</strong>se were mainly given to children but the<br />

Health Department did not observe the legal consent requirements, instead procuring<br />

agreement from family kumatua or the native schoolteacher rather than parents<br />

themselves. This illegal procedure was to have serious repercussions in the 1940s and<br />

1950s for the Health Department.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!