16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> polio in Canada up until 1962. 12 As with works on an individual disease,<br />

immunisation was encompassed within the story. Rutty made an important<br />

contribution to the historiography <strong>of</strong> the polio vaccines as he examined the significant<br />

and <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked contribution <strong>of</strong> Canada to their development in the later<br />

chapters. He also highlighted the role <strong>of</strong> Connaught Serum Laboratories and the<br />

contribution <strong>of</strong> key players who helped bring the vaccine and immunisation<br />

campaigns to fruition. Again, however, the work was introspective, focusing<br />

primarily on Canada, although the contribution and influence <strong>of</strong> the United States was<br />

acknowledged. Polio vaccine developments in other parts <strong>of</strong> the world were largely<br />

ignored as well as the views <strong>of</strong> those ‘from below’. Nevertheless, it was a detailed<br />

and careful account, which provided a comparison for the New Zealand polio<br />

experience and was especially useful for contributing the ‘other side <strong>of</strong> story’ <strong>of</strong> the<br />

SV40 controversy <strong>of</strong> the 1970s and 1980s in New Zealand. 13<br />

Jennifer Stanton’s thesis also focused on a disease, this time on hepatitis B in<br />

Britain. 14 Additionally, she published an article based on the chapter on hepatitis B<br />

immunisation. 15 In both the article and thesis she examined the issues which<br />

determined hepatitis B immunisation policy in Britain. Policy at the time was to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

immunisation only to ‘at risk’ groups which included health workers and drug users.<br />

She argued that because <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> factors including the high cost <strong>of</strong> the vaccine,<br />

the relative confinement <strong>of</strong> the disease to the ‘risk groups’ and stigmatization, any<br />

further extension <strong>of</strong> this policy was not advocated. This provided a direct contrast<br />

with the situation in New Zealand where the threat was to all children. Stanton did not<br />

make any comparisons to experiences overseas; the United States experienced a<br />

situation similar to the one in Britain but this was not discussed.<br />

One <strong>PhD</strong> thesis which focused specifically on immunisation was by Patrick Vivier.<br />

He considered national immunisation policy in the United States from 1955. 16 One <strong>of</strong><br />

12<br />

C. J. Rutty, ‘Do Something!...Do Anything! Poliomyelitis in Canada 1927-1962’, <strong>PhD</strong> thesis,<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Toronto, 1995.<br />

13<br />

For a detailed discussion <strong>of</strong> SV40 and its impact see Chapter 8, pp.232-38, pp.244-49.<br />

14<br />

J. M. Stanton, ‘Health policy and medical research: hepatitis B in the UK since the 1940s’, <strong>PhD</strong><br />

thesis, London <strong>University</strong>, 1995.<br />

15<br />

J. M. Stanton, ‘What shapes vaccine policy? <strong>The</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Hepatitis B in the UK’, Social History <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicine, 7, 3, 1994, pp.427-47.<br />

16<br />

P. M. Vivier, ‘National Policies for Childhood Immunization in the United States: An Historical<br />

Perspective’, <strong>PhD</strong> thesis, John Hopkins <strong>University</strong>, 1996.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!