16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

advised that antiseptic should be used by CSL in all vaccines to prevent<br />

contamination. 27<br />

This disaster had serious repercussions in Australia. In a press release put out just<br />

before the Bundaberg tragedy the Department <strong>of</strong> Public Health had advised parents to<br />

have their children immunised against diphtheria. 28 Extensive publicity was given to<br />

this disaster in the newspapers and at the Brisbane Children’s Hospital and in towns<br />

diphtheria immunisation was stopped within forty-eight hours <strong>of</strong> the event. 29 Historian<br />

Claire Hooker has argued that as a result in ‘most areas immunisation was not<br />

undertaken again for the next few years, although she pointed out that it is unclear<br />

how much the delay was due to community resistance or to political caution. 30<br />

Across the Tasman Sea, the New Zealand Health Department had just extended the<br />

immunisation programme but felt that, ‘In light <strong>of</strong> the few tragedies at Bundaberg and<br />

elsewhere it is open to doubt whether, particularly in New Zealand, immunization<br />

with toxin-antitoxin should be recommended’. 31 <strong>The</strong> Health Department noted that<br />

although they were using CSL vaccine there had been no unfavourable side-effects<br />

other than <strong>of</strong> a ‘slight and transient nature’; fresh vaccine was used every day and not<br />

carried over. 32 Nevertheless, Bundaberg was a serious blow to immunisation in New<br />

Zealand as it dampened the enthusiasm and confidence <strong>of</strong> the Health Department and<br />

the Division <strong>of</strong> School Hygiene in the safety <strong>of</strong> the vaccine. <strong>The</strong> programme fell<br />

‘temporarily into abeyance’ due to ‘much public alarm’. 33 By 1928 parents had been<br />

taking ‘advantage <strong>of</strong> this treatment fairly extensively’ at schools located in parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Auckland</strong> where diphtheria had occurred. 34 Such was the impact <strong>of</strong> Bundaberg that<br />

by 1932 the Department predicted that ‘unless the public avail themselves more<br />

widely <strong>of</strong> this proved preventative we must expect in the course <strong>of</strong> the next year or<br />

27 ibid., p.26.<br />

28 P. J. Tyler, ‘An Irreproachable Instrument? <strong>The</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Health and Public Health Administration<br />

in New South Wales, 1881-1973’, unpublished <strong>PhD</strong> dissertation, Armidale, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> New<br />

England, November 1998, p.195.<br />

29 C. Hooker, ‘Diphtheria, Immunisation and the Bundaberg Tragedy’, p.70.<br />

30 ibid.<br />

31 AJHR, 1928, H-31, p.12.<br />

32 AJHR, 1928, H-31, p.25.<br />

33 AJHR, 1932-33, H-31, p.2.<br />

34 ibid.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!