16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

not have mandatory immunisation but nor did they have such a strong history <strong>of</strong> anti-<br />

immunisation sentiment as Britain.<br />

<strong>The</strong> controversy over the safety <strong>of</strong> the pertussis vaccine was also the subject <strong>of</strong> an<br />

article by David and Mark Geier. 22 <strong>The</strong>y argued that there was a direct correlation<br />

between an increasing number <strong>of</strong> lawsuits which applied to the pertussis vaccine, a<br />

drop in the number <strong>of</strong> manufacturers who produced it, and the push in the United<br />

States to change to the safer acellular vaccine. <strong>The</strong> article was predominantly focused<br />

on events in the United States which led to the adoption <strong>of</strong> the acellular vaccine,<br />

although comparisons are drawn with other countries, especially Britain and the<br />

pertussis controversy that occurred there. However, the article centred on the legal<br />

and political implications; parental responses to the pertussis vaccine in the United<br />

States were not examined in any detail.<br />

In contrast to most historians <strong>of</strong> individual disease, who have concentrated only on the<br />

local context, historians who have focused specifically on immunisation have adopted<br />

a more comparative perspective. One <strong>of</strong> the earliest articles employing this technique<br />

was by Jane Lewis which considered diphtheria immunisation in Canada and<br />

Britain. 23 This paper, alongside Evelyn Hammonds’ book on diphtheria in New York<br />

City and Claire Hooker’s article on Australia, was among the few works to consider<br />

both diphtheria and immunisation. Lewis’ comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> diphtheria<br />

immunisation in Britain and Canada found that using publicity alongside mass school<br />

immunisation campaigns was essential to greatly improving levels <strong>of</strong> immunisation,<br />

an argument supported by Hammonds. Lewis examined the quite different<br />

experiences <strong>of</strong> Britain and Canada and argued that in the case <strong>of</strong> Britain, cautious<br />

attitudes, local authority reluctance to implement immunisation and a lack <strong>of</strong> funding<br />

meant that a national scheme was implemented much later than in Ontario, Canada<br />

where funding, vaccine and a government-run programme were all in place by the late<br />

1920s. However, Lewis did not explore popular feeling towards immunisation in<br />

Britain which may also have affected uptake. Anti-immunisation movements against<br />

22 D. Geier, M. Geier, ‘<strong>The</strong> True Story <strong>of</strong> Pertussis Vaccination: A Sordid Legacy?’ Journal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

History <strong>of</strong> Medicine and Allied Sciences, 57, 2002, pp.249-84.<br />

23 J. Lewis, ‘<strong>The</strong> prevention <strong>of</strong> diphtheria in Canada and Britain 1914-1945’, Journal <strong>of</strong> Social History,<br />

20, 1986-87, pp.163-76.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!