16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Vaccine Does U-Turn’ was the headline in the New Zealand Herald. 149 <strong>The</strong> New<br />

Zealand Listener called the Department’s actions, ‘a lesson in how not to maintain<br />

credibility’. 150 A paediatric neurologist, Dr David Jamison, was appointed by the<br />

Department to examine the 546 children in whom a reaction had occurred. After<br />

reviewing Jamison’s findings, the Medical Assessor <strong>of</strong> the Medicines Adverse<br />

Reactions Committee, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Ralph Edwards, advised that any child who had<br />

suffered any type <strong>of</strong> reaction to the first injection should not receive a booster ‘given<br />

that some doubt must now be present’. 151 He did conclude ‘it was reasonable to<br />

continue to <strong>of</strong>fer primary vaccination so long as there is a risk <strong>of</strong> a child developing<br />

meningitis’. 152 He also recommended that the Department should not undertake any<br />

more campaigns without ‘some prospective method <strong>of</strong> obtaining information<br />

concerning adverse effects’. 153 <strong>The</strong> Department had already delayed the booster<br />

programme until the results <strong>of</strong> the assessments were known and the programme did<br />

not commence until mid-September. In the primary campaign over 90 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

eligible children had received a meningitis immunisation before the controversy<br />

erupted. 154 However, the booster campaign attracted only a 30 per cent take-up,<br />

attributed to the adverse publicity. 155<br />

George Salmond, the Director-General <strong>of</strong> Health, explained to the New Zealand<br />

Listener that the epidemic ‘sort <strong>of</strong> sneaked up on us in a way’ and that he did not<br />

realise it was a significant problem in <strong>Auckland</strong> until early 1987. 156 This gave only a<br />

short time to prepare pre-campaign publicity. Nevertheless, the Department was not<br />

keen to share information with parents. Dr John McLeod argued during the campaign<br />

that the ‘majority <strong>of</strong> people don’t want all that information. Most believe we are out<br />

to help them, not destroy them’. 157 It was not until afterwards that both he and<br />

Salmond admitted parents should have been given more information with McLeod<br />

149<br />

NZH, 12 July 1987.<br />

150<br />

F. Macdonald, ‘Meningitis’, p.18.<br />

151<br />

‘Report on Clinical Events following Meningitis A vaccination in <strong>Auckland</strong>’, ABQU 632<br />

W4415/918 67372 144/39, ANZ, Wellington.<br />

152<br />

ibid.<br />

153<br />

ibid.<br />

154<br />

‘Meningococcal Meningitis Immunisation Campaign in <strong>Auckland</strong> 1987’, ABQU 632 W4415/918<br />

67372 144/39, ANZ, Wellington.<br />

155<br />

‘Meningococcal Meningitis ‘Mop Up’ Campaign, <strong>Auckland</strong> Region, 1988’, ABQU 632<br />

W4415/918 67372 144/39, ANZ, Wellington.<br />

156<br />

F. Macdonald, ‘Meningitis’, p.17.<br />

157 SS, 5 July 1987.<br />

263

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!