16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16, found that 88 per cent were Schick negative (immune to diphtheria). As the<br />

Department was hoping to achieve 70 per cent coverage this was a pleasing figure. 64 It<br />

also demonstrated that most parents were receptive to immunisation and did take their<br />

children to complete the required number <strong>of</strong> injections despite Health Department<br />

fears.<br />

<strong>The</strong> BCG campaign was low-key in comparison to diphtheria; departmental<br />

instructions for publicity stated that ‘its initial stages, other than the customary press<br />

statement in local newspapers <strong>of</strong> the commencement <strong>of</strong> work in the area, consist <strong>of</strong><br />

little more than the individual distribution <strong>of</strong> a pamphlet entitled,<br />

Tuberculosis Series - Vaccination against Tuberculosis. 65 Health magazine also<br />

published two articles on BCG in the mid-1950s intended to inform readers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reasons for administering both the vaccine and the preliminary Mantoux skin test. 66<br />

<strong>The</strong> differences in the types <strong>of</strong> campaigns adopted by the Department at this point can<br />

be accounted for by considering the intended recipients. BCG was aimed purely at<br />

schoolchildren and therefore only required parents to sign a consent form. Diphtheria,<br />

however, required parents to bring a small child to a clinic for immunisations, hence,<br />

much more parental effort was required to achieve the desired end. Consequently,<br />

diphtheria immunisation needed to be more heavily promoted to reach the intended<br />

recipients and persuade them it was worth the effort involved.<br />

Information to, and education <strong>of</strong>, parents assumed increasing importance in the<br />

immunisation campaigns <strong>of</strong> the 1940s and 1950s. Very little information was<br />

provided earlier in the century to parents as the Department did not perceive it was<br />

necessary. Additionally, the Department assumed, rightly in most cases, that it would<br />

be dealing with the mother who would be responsible for signing forms and bringing<br />

children in for immunisations. This certainly coloured the Department’s perception <strong>of</strong><br />

how promotional material, such as posters and pamphlets, should look and influenced<br />

what they contained. <strong>The</strong> initial letter regarding diphtheria immunisation was sent out<br />

when the child was either six months or one year old and was always addressed to the<br />

mother. <strong>The</strong> Medical Officer <strong>of</strong> Health for Timaru, G. L. McLeod, commented<br />

64<br />

AJHR, 1957, H-31, p.16.<br />

65<br />

‘Immunization against Tuberculosis’, undated, H-NA 478 BCG General Policy - Napier, ANZ,<br />

Wellington.<br />

66<br />

Health, June 1954, p.7, March 1956, pp.4-5.<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!