16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

only company producing a vaccine suitable for children under two was Connaught<br />

Serum Laboratories, the Canadian vaccine manufacturing company which was also<br />

based in the United States. Menomune A was quickly registered in New Zealand and<br />

a campaign prepared to immunise approximately 150,000 children from three months<br />

<strong>of</strong> age to Form 2 (aged 12). <strong>The</strong> programme commenced on 26 May 1987. Booster<br />

doses were to be given to children over three months and under two, all other children<br />

received one dose only. <strong>The</strong> actual vaccine batches sent to New Zealand had been<br />

tested by the manufacturer but not by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), nor<br />

were they tested when they reached New Zealand as there were no facilities for doing<br />

so. 139 Nevertheless, as the vaccine had been approved by the FDA for use in the<br />

United States and Canada as well as several other countries, the Health Department<br />

felt confident <strong>of</strong> its safety. 140<br />

<strong>The</strong> pupils at Drury Primary School were immunised on 29 June 1987 near the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the campaign. As the vaccine had been stored incorrectly (the refrigerator fuse had<br />

blown), more vaccine had to be sent for and pupils had to wait about an hour for their<br />

injections. Subsequently there were many reports <strong>of</strong> reactions that included nausea,<br />

vomiting and fainting. Some children also complained <strong>of</strong> headaches, a stiff neck and<br />

difficulty in limb movement. <strong>The</strong> South <strong>Auckland</strong> Medical Officer for Health, Dr<br />

Allan Cowan dismissed these symptoms as vaccine reactions, pointing out that it was<br />

a ‘psychological thing. From what I can understand, the youngsters got all worked<br />

up’. 141 Up to this point about 80 to 90 reactions had been reported to District Health<br />

Officers. 142 Intense media coverage, much <strong>of</strong> it negative, and similar results at other<br />

schools soon forced the Department to review its decision <strong>of</strong> dismissing these<br />

reactions as a hysterical response.<br />

Unfortunately for the Department, its handling <strong>of</strong> this crisis did nothing to allay<br />

parental anxieties. It had still been adhering to the practice <strong>of</strong> giving parents little<br />

information with regard to immunisation; its leaflet to accompany this campaign was,<br />

139<br />

Meningococcal Meningitis Immunisation Campaign in <strong>Auckland</strong> 1987’, ABQU 632 W4415/918<br />

67372 144/39, ANZ, Wellington. <strong>The</strong> FDA had reviewed batch documentation and analytical results<br />

produced by Connaught.<br />

140<br />

ibid.<br />

141<br />

NZH, 1 July 1987.<br />

142<br />

Meningococcal Meningitis Immunisation Campaign in <strong>Auckland</strong> 1987’, ABQU 632 W4415/918<br />

67372 144/39, ANZ, Wellington.<br />

261

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!