16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 4: ‘Something Everybody Did?’<br />

Attitudes and responses to immunisation policy 1941-1962<br />

During the period 1941-62 the immunisation <strong>of</strong> infants, toddlers and schoolchildren<br />

gradually became an accepted health prevention measure by the majority <strong>of</strong> New<br />

Zealand parents. <strong>The</strong> Health Department developed a programme <strong>of</strong> health education<br />

to inform the public <strong>of</strong> many health issues, and in particular promote immunisation.<br />

This chapter will consider parental attitudes and responses to immunisation and will<br />

look at how effective the Department’s campaigns were in encouraging acceptance.<br />

Opposition, mainly from the British Union for the Abolition <strong>of</strong> Vivisection (BUAV),<br />

was at its height up until the mid-1950s when a change in focus removed its presence<br />

from the anti-immunisation scene. <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> the BUAV and its impact upon<br />

immunisation and upon both parents and the Health Department will be discussed.<br />

Maori were also the focus <strong>of</strong> departmental immunisation schemes in the 1940s and<br />

1950s, specifically against typhoid. <strong>The</strong> growing social awareness by Maori led to<br />

more frequent opposition to these immunisations, whilst the Health Department had to<br />

contend with the legalities <strong>of</strong> immunising without parental consent. <strong>The</strong> implications<br />

<strong>of</strong> this perturbing situation will be analysed during the chapter.<br />

Consent<br />

In order for an immunisation to be administered to an infant or a child, consent, either<br />

written or verbal, had to be given by a parent or legal guardian. 1 In school-based<br />

campaigns, such as those for BCG, written consent was required, whilst a verbal<br />

agreement was <strong>of</strong>ten the method used when a mother brought her infant to the doctor<br />

for his or her scheduled immunisations.<br />

Consent issues had been raised by parents during the diphtheria immunisation<br />

campaign <strong>of</strong> the 1940s and 50s. One parent protested vociferously to the Director-<br />

General <strong>of</strong> Health when his son was taken from his class and given a diphtheria<br />

1 Consent had to be given under 1908 Infants Amendment Act s.5.<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!