16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

through their surgeries. <strong>The</strong>y hoped ‘that there will be a considerable extension <strong>of</strong> this<br />

work in the Dominion’. 68<br />

This scheme, aimed at reaching preschoolers, was not very successful due to the cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> three visits to the doctor as well as parental concerns regarding immunisation.<br />

Additionally, although Turbott and Director-General <strong>of</strong> Health, Michael Watt, were<br />

keen to extend the immunisation programme, many Medical Officers <strong>of</strong> Health did<br />

not share their enthusiasm, preferring to await the outcome <strong>of</strong> Turbott’s efforts in the<br />

East Cape. <strong>The</strong> Health Department left it up to individual Medical Officers <strong>of</strong> Health<br />

to implement school-based diphtheria immunisation programmes and did not co-<br />

ordinate them or introduce a standard scheme throughout the country. Programmes<br />

that did take place, such as in Wellington in 1938-39, were undertaken once the<br />

success <strong>of</strong> East Cape and then South <strong>Auckland</strong> had been established. For any further<br />

progress central direction and implementation <strong>of</strong> a nationwide programme was<br />

imperative so efforts could be co-ordinated and coverage massively extended.<br />

Low staffing levels also meant it was difficult to implement the immunisation<br />

programme in schools. Kinohaku School in the Waikato experienced an outbreak <strong>of</strong><br />

diphtheria in 1937 and the School Committee tried, without success, to arrange for the<br />

immunisation <strong>of</strong> their schoolchildren. <strong>The</strong>y were told by the Department that ‘it was<br />

impossible to arrange the matter as their <strong>of</strong>ficers were overworked now and had their<br />

hands full’. 69 <strong>The</strong> School Committee therefore had to arrange for a local practitioner<br />

to undertake the immunisations. 70 <strong>The</strong> School Medical Service before 1939 was<br />

affected by both a lack <strong>of</strong> resources and a reduction in staff numbers. This<br />

corresponded with a rise in the numbers <strong>of</strong> children to be inspected, from 78,980 in<br />

1921 to 107,556 in 1938. 71 Given that the main focus <strong>of</strong> the School Medical Service<br />

was physical examinations, little time was left to fit such extras as diphtheria<br />

immunisation.<br />

68<br />

‘Diphtheria Immunisation’, H1 131/11/6 B.92, ANZ, Wellington.<br />

69<br />

J. Schultz to Minister <strong>of</strong> Health, 8 December 1937, H1 131/11/6 B.99, Diphtheria in Schools 1933-<br />

39, ANZ, Wellington.<br />

70<br />

<strong>The</strong> doctor charged ₤20 for this service which the Department refused to refund on the grounds that<br />

there was no need for urgency. This was because the immunisation took at least three months to work<br />

and would have had no effect in an ongoing epidemic.<br />

71<br />

M. Tennant,, ‘Missionaries <strong>of</strong> Health. <strong>The</strong> School Medical Service during the Interwar Period’, ed.<br />

L. Bryder, A Healthy Country. Essays on the Social History <strong>of</strong> Medicine in New Zealand, Wellington,<br />

1991, p.132.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!