16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ate. In these places BCG should be used for ‘at risk’ groups, such as babies and<br />

adolescents, in areas where the incidence <strong>of</strong> tuberculosis was high. 105 Before the<br />

1970s districts themselves decided whether to vaccinate ‘at risk’ babies and<br />

preschoolers. Hutt Health District had been vaccinating Maori babies with BCG since<br />

1958. 106 By the 1970s the selective BCG policy had become established with all<br />

districts identifying those babies ‘at risk’. Neonates were usually immunised in<br />

hospital within the first week <strong>of</strong> life and all Maori and Pacific Island mothers were<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered BCG for their babies. European mothers could request the vaccine if they so<br />

wished.<br />

Although the Health Department was implementing WHO recommendations, it was<br />

identified in New Zealand that racial groups, not specific age groups, were ‘at risk’<br />

and hence should be targeted for vaccination. It had been found that ‘the Maori child<br />

is more than five times as likely as the European child and the Pacific Islander child is<br />

more than 50 times as likely as the European child, to contract tuberculosis’. 107 An<br />

article in the <strong>Auckland</strong> Star, which focused on the neonate programme, misquoted Dr<br />

G. B. Collison, the Deputy Medical Officer <strong>of</strong> Health for <strong>Auckland</strong>, by reporting that<br />

a compulsory BCG programme for Pacific Islanders was being given consideration.<br />

This was condemned as ‘racial discrimination’ by groups such as Halt All Racist<br />

Tours (HART) and the Citizens Association for Racial Equality (CARE) who<br />

believed it would be better to immunise all children. 108<br />

Policies such as these did leave the Department open to criticism that programmes<br />

were being conducted along racial lines. However, apart from the occasional<br />

comment, the neonate BCG programme was accepted by the majority <strong>of</strong> mothers. In<br />

1974, a total <strong>of</strong> 1081 babies were vaccinated at the participating hospitals <strong>of</strong><br />

Wellington, St Helens and Kerepuru. 109 In <strong>Auckland</strong>, from July to December 1976,<br />

105<br />

‘Policy for B.C.G. Vaccination’ 12 December 1962, H1 246/64 34419, BCG Vaccination 1956-69,<br />

ANZ, Wellington.<br />

106<br />

M. C. Laing to DGH, 21 September 1964, H1 246/64 34419, ANZ, Wellington.<br />

107<br />

‘B.C.G. Vaccination <strong>of</strong> At Risk Neonates’, BAAK A358 131a Tuberculosis - BCG and Tuberculin<br />

testing 1958-68, 1970-74, ANZ, <strong>Auckland</strong>.<br />

108<br />

<strong>Auckland</strong> Star (AS), 18 March 1976. HART was New Zealand’s anti-apartheid movement and was<br />

especially visible in protests at the 1981 Springbok tour. CARE’s brief was to oppose racial prejudice<br />

in all forms, both in New Zealand and overseas.<br />

109<br />

‘BCG Vaccinations <strong>of</strong> Neonates in the Wellington and Porirua Districts 1974 at Wellington Public<br />

Hospital, St. Helens and Kenepuru Hospitals’, 23 January 1975, BAAK A358 131a, ANZ, <strong>Auckland</strong>.<br />

220

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!