16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

wish to immunise on these grounds. Nevertheless, the Department needed to maintain<br />

public confidence in immunisation in order to keep up immunity levels within the<br />

community. <strong>The</strong> Health Department consistently responded to attempts by the BUAV<br />

to undermine its position, by demonstrating to parents the inaccuracies in the<br />

organisation’s statements, and by reassuring them constantly in various ways that<br />

immunisation was safe.<br />

Future events at the BUAV favoured the Health Department however. <strong>The</strong> head<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the organisation was in London, and it was likely that its policy directives<br />

were sent from there to all branches, including those overseas, such as <strong>Auckland</strong> and<br />

Wellington. <strong>The</strong> BUAV had had a strong anti-immunisation focus when Dr Walter<br />

Hadwen was President until his death in 1932. Successive presidents, although<br />

concerned about immunisation, shifted the focus <strong>of</strong> the organisation more towards<br />

anti-vivisection. In 1946 the National Health Service Act was passed in Britain which<br />

amongst other things repealed the practice <strong>of</strong> compulsory vaccination in Britain which<br />

the BUAV had long campaigned for. In addition, in 1947, the BUAV and other anti-<br />

vivisection groups in Britain lost their charitable status, which meant they were now<br />

subject to tax and had much less revenue with which to promote their cause. 139<br />

By the late 1940s anti-vivisection became the main focus <strong>of</strong> the BUAV rather than<br />

anti-immunisation as had been the case in the past. It is likely that the repeal <strong>of</strong><br />

mandatory immunisation and loss <strong>of</strong> revenue led head <strong>of</strong>fice to the conclusion that<br />

anti-immunisation was not the priority it had been and hence other issues took its<br />

place. This change in emphasis for the organisation was passed on to the branches,<br />

both in Britain and overseas. As a consequence, by 1955, the BUAV had dropped out<br />

<strong>of</strong> the anti-immunisation scene in New Zealand to concentrate on anti-vivisection.<br />

<strong>The</strong> space left by the BUAV in opposing the Health Department on immunisation<br />

issues was not filled for another 30 years, until the 1980s with the advent <strong>of</strong> another<br />

opposition group. 140<br />

139 E. Hopley, Campaigning against Cruelty. <strong>The</strong> hundred year history <strong>of</strong> the British Union for the<br />

Abolition <strong>of</strong> Vivisection, London, 1998, p.56.<br />

140 See Chapter 9 for a full discussion, pp.279-82.<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!