16.11.2012 Views

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

PhD Thesis - ResearchSpace@Auckland - The University of Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

To identify attitudes to immunisation in preparation for the launch <strong>of</strong> the measles,<br />

mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) from 1990 to 1991, the Health Department<br />

commissioned a report from the National Research Bureau who interviewed 800<br />

caregivers with children under two. 121 <strong>The</strong> report classified parents into four main<br />

groups: the first were the ‘questioning acceptors’ who were likely to be European,<br />

well-educated and from the higher end <strong>of</strong> the socio-economic and socio-occupational<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the spectrum. <strong>The</strong>y were characterised as accepting immunisation for their<br />

children but wanting plenty <strong>of</strong> information before making an informed decision. <strong>The</strong><br />

second group, the ‘lapsed by-passers’, tended to be from the lower end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

spectrum and typified as a ‘Pacific Island or Maori caregiver’. 122 <strong>The</strong>y accepted<br />

immunisation was ‘necessary or desirable’ but there were <strong>of</strong>ten difficulties in<br />

achieving this, coupled with ‘no particular sense <strong>of</strong> urgency to get their children<br />

immunised’. 123 <strong>The</strong> third group consisted <strong>of</strong> the ‘acceptors’ who accepted<br />

immunisation without question and tended to be from the lower end <strong>of</strong> the socio-<br />

economic spectrum. <strong>The</strong> final group was the ‘rejecting questioners’ usually<br />

European, well educated and at the higher end <strong>of</strong> the scale. <strong>The</strong>se parents believed<br />

immunisation was unnecessary and rejected the ‘authority <strong>of</strong> health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals’. 124<br />

Certainly by the late 1980s this seemed a fair representation <strong>of</strong> parental views on<br />

immunisation in New Zealand, although it must be pointed out that the lines were not<br />

hard and fast and that there were some people, Maori, Pacific Island and Europeans,<br />

who fell into other categories, determined by their education and socio-economic<br />

status. One Pacific Island mother <strong>of</strong> three was well-educated and had had her children<br />

immunised but would be classed as a ‘questioning acceptor’ as she had made it her<br />

business to find out more about the subject. 125<br />

<strong>The</strong> study revealed that 92 percent <strong>of</strong> parents were in favour <strong>of</strong> immunisation,<br />

believing either that it was necessary (68 percent) or desirable (24 percent). 126<br />

Notwithstanding, one doctor identified another group <strong>of</strong> parents, not just Pacific<br />

121<br />

National Research Bureau, ‘Attitudes to Immunisation’, prepared for the Health Department,<br />

January 1990, ABQU 632 W4452/918 144/56, ANZ, Wellington. As MMR was introduced after 1990<br />

it falls outside the scope <strong>of</strong> this thesis.<br />

122<br />

ibid, p.7.<br />

123<br />

ibid.<br />

124<br />

ibid.<br />

125<br />

Interview with L. Aumua, 31 July 2002, parent 1980s and 1990s.<br />

126<br />

National Research Bureau, ‘Attitudes to Immunisation’, prepared for the Health Department,<br />

January 1990, p.9, ABQU 632 W4452/918 144/56, ANZ, Wellington.<br />

291

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!