17.05.2015 Views

Republic of Montenegro: Public Expenditure and ... - Vlada Crne Gore

Republic of Montenegro: Public Expenditure and ... - Vlada Crne Gore

Republic of Montenegro: Public Expenditure and ... - Vlada Crne Gore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2: Composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Expenditure</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

Key Sources <strong>of</strong> Fiscal Pressure 15<br />

Table 2.3. General Government Spending, Functional Classification, 2004 (% GDP)<br />

General<br />

<strong>Public</strong><br />

Defense <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Public</strong> Order<br />

Education Health Social Protection Economic<br />

Affairs<br />

Services<br />

Total Defense Total Pensions<br />

<strong>Montenegro</strong> 8.9 6.0 2.0 5.7 6.2 14.6 … 2.3<br />

Bosnia & Herzegovina 7.7 7.2 2.4 6.2 7.0 15.1 8.4 4.3<br />

Croatia 2.5 4.9 2.3 4.3 6.6 15.1 … …<br />

New Member Countries<br />

Estonia … … 2.0 5.7 … 14.3 6.1 3.8<br />

Lithuania 4.6 3.6 1.6 5.9 3.8 15.2 6.2 4.4<br />

Slovenia 8.5 3.4 1.4 5.9 6.8 18.3 11.6 3.5<br />

Slovakia 5.0 3.8 1.8 1.8 4.4 8.4 7.6 4.7<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> 7.0 2.2 1.8 5.6 4.1 22.1 11.6 3.2<br />

EU-8 Average 6.1 3.5 1.7 5.1 4.7 15.9 8.8 4.5<br />

Others<br />

Chile 0.3 2.7 … 3.8 3.0 7.5 2.9 2.7<br />

Irel<strong>and</strong> 2.3 2.2 0.6 4.4 6.4 9.5 3.1 5.1<br />

Sources: Montenegrin Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance; IMF; World Bank: Bulgaria <strong>Public</strong> Finance Policy Review (November 2005)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Bosnia <strong>and</strong> Herzegovina <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Expenditure</strong> <strong>and</strong> Institutional Review (April 2006).<br />

Box 2.1. Fiscal Operations <strong>of</strong> the Extra-Budgetary Social Funds<br />

The consolidated general government in <strong>Montenegro</strong> covers the Montenegrin <strong>Republic</strong>an budget (central<br />

government), <strong>and</strong> three extra budgetary funds--the Pensions Fund (PIO), the Health Insurance Fund (HIF), <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Employment Fund. Total expenditures by the extra-budgetary social funds accounted for about 17 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP in<br />

2005. Most <strong>of</strong> the pensions, health care, <strong>and</strong> unemployment services are delivered through these social funds.<br />

Pension Fund (PIO). In 2005, the PIO spending amounted to about 10.5 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP. About 84 percent <strong>of</strong> this<br />

(8.8 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP) was on pensions while health contributions accounted for another 11 percent (1.2 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

GDP). The remainder was spent on non-pension benefits <strong>and</strong> on administrative expenditures. On the revenue side,<br />

contribution revenue amounted to 72 percent <strong>of</strong> total revenue (7.2 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP), <strong>and</strong> transfers from republican<br />

treasury amounted to 27 percent <strong>of</strong> total (2.7 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP). The Fund’s operational deficit was about 1.5 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> GDP. The total stock <strong>of</strong> PIO arrears stood at 19.02 million euros at end-2005, <strong>of</strong> which the stock <strong>of</strong> pensions<br />

benefit arrears amounted to 17.1 million euros.<br />

Health Insurance Fund (HIF). In 2005, the HIF spending amounted to about 6.6 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP. About 49<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> this (or 3 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP) was on health care. Gross salaries <strong>and</strong> contributions charged to the employer<br />

amounted to another 44 percent <strong>of</strong> total spending (2.7 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP). The remainder was spent on non-health<br />

benefits <strong>and</strong> on administrative expenditures. On the revenue side, contribution revenue amounted to 74 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

total revenue (4.6 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP), <strong>and</strong> transfers from the republican treasury <strong>and</strong> the PIO amounted to 26 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> total (1.6 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP). The Fund’s operational deficit was about 0.1 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP. The total stock <strong>of</strong> HIF<br />

arrears stood at 14.5 million euros at end-2005, <strong>of</strong> which the stock <strong>of</strong> health benefit arrears amounted to 10.4 million<br />

euros.<br />

Employment Fund (EF). The Employment Fund <strong>of</strong> <strong>Montenegro</strong> is the main provider <strong>of</strong> employment services to<br />

job seekers. In 2005, its expenditure amounted to about 1.2 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP. About 50 percent <strong>of</strong> this (0.6 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

GDP) was on benefits to unemployed individuals. The remainder was on administrative <strong>and</strong> operational expenses<br />

(30 percent <strong>of</strong> total), <strong>and</strong> loans <strong>and</strong> credits to new unemployed persons (17 percent <strong>of</strong> total expenditure). On the<br />

revenue side, about 50 percent <strong>of</strong> the total revenue came from contributions, <strong>and</strong> about 20 percent from republican<br />

transfers. The rest (30 percent) came from duties <strong>and</strong> receipts from repayment <strong>of</strong> loans given to other institutions.<br />

The Fund’s operational deficit was about 0.2 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP. The total stock <strong>of</strong> EF arrears stood at 4.4 million euros<br />

at end-2005.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!