21.06.2015 Views

Proceedings - C-SRNWP Project

Proceedings - C-SRNWP Project

Proceedings - C-SRNWP Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A simple parameterization for detrainment in shallow<br />

cumulus.<br />

Wim de Rooy and Pier Siebesma<br />

Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, The Netherlands<br />

Recently there has been a regained<br />

interest in the parameterization for<br />

entrainment in cumulus convection.<br />

Unfortunately little attention has been paid<br />

to the parameterization of the detrainment<br />

process although this counterpart of the<br />

cloud mixing process is, as this study<br />

shows, even more important for obtaining<br />

realistic mass flux profiles in cumulus<br />

convection.<br />

A new simple but flexible<br />

parameterization for the detrainment<br />

process in shallow convection is presented.<br />

From ensemble considerations and<br />

confirmed by LES results it is shown that<br />

the magnitude of the fractional detrainment<br />

for shallow convection is decreasing with<br />

increasing depth of the cloud layer. A<br />

simple detrainment formulation is<br />

presented that takes this dependency into<br />

account by considering the mass flux<br />

profile in a non-dimensionalized way. The<br />

only free parameter in this detrainment<br />

formulation is the percentage of the mass<br />

flux at cloud base that is still present halfway<br />

the cloud layer (called m * ). This free<br />

parameter turns out to depend on the<br />

environmental conditions as well as<br />

updraft properties and can be expressed<br />

with a parameter coming from the<br />

buoyancy sorting concept, χ<br />

c<br />

, the fraction<br />

of environmental air necessary to make the<br />

updraft air just neutrally buoyant and<br />

averaged over the lowest half of the cloud<br />

layer. LES results show a distinct relation<br />

___________________<br />

* Corresponding author address: Wim<br />

de Rooy, KNMI, P.O. Box 201, 3730<br />

AE, De Bilt, The Netherlands. E-mail:<br />

rooyde@knmi.nl<br />

between m * and χ<br />

c<br />

which can be used to<br />

close our parameterization.<br />

z [m]<br />

2500<br />

2250<br />

2000<br />

1750<br />

1500<br />

1250<br />

1000<br />

750<br />

500<br />

250<br />

0<br />

initial profile (0:00 UTC)<br />

LES (24:00 UTC)<br />

fixed ε and δ (24:00 UTC)<br />

new δ (24:00 UTC)<br />

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

q t<br />

[gr kg -1 ]<br />

Fig. 2. Total specific humidity profiles<br />

after 24 hrs of simulation during the RICO<br />

case for the LES model (black squares)<br />

and the SCM using fixed ε and δ (blue<br />

squares) or the new detrainment<br />

parameterization (red triangles). The black<br />

solid line represents the initial profile.<br />

Results of the new parameterization in<br />

a Hirlam single column model (SCM) for a<br />

wide range of shallow cumulus convection<br />

cases (BOMEX, ARM and RICO)<br />

illustrate the strength of this new<br />

detrainment parameterization. As an<br />

example, we show in Fig. 2 the total<br />

specific humidity profile of the<br />

independent RICO case after 24 hours of<br />

simulation. Presented are the results for an<br />

LES model, a SCM with fixed fractional<br />

entrainment (ε) and detrainment (δ)<br />

coefficients as known from literature, and<br />

finally a SCM with the new detrainment<br />

parameterization. The new<br />

parameterization gives an almost perfect<br />

match with the LES humidity profile.<br />

There is also a large improvement on the<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!