21.06.2015 Views

Proceedings - C-SRNWP Project

Proceedings - C-SRNWP Project

Proceedings - C-SRNWP Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3D-FGAT<br />

Tests with the 3D-FGAT method were started at the Hungarian Meteorological Service.<br />

Originally the 3D-FGAT coded in ARPEGE/ALADIN adds the analysis increment to the<br />

background at the beginning of the assimilation window, as it is a simplification of 4DVAR.<br />

For better comparison with 3DVAR this feature was changed by adding the increment to the<br />

background at the middle of the assimilation window. For the comparison of 3D-FGAT with<br />

3DVAR several assimilation experiments were run using as many observations as possible.<br />

Results show, that the FGAT method can improve the quality of the forecast at the beginning<br />

of the integration for geopotential, wind and slightly for temperature but degrades the scores<br />

for humidity in the PBL. On Fig 2. the impact of the FGAT is shown for geopotential as an<br />

example.<br />

Fig 2. Impact of the 3D-FGAT compared to 3DVAR. Red colors correspond to improvement, blue colors to<br />

degradation due to FGAT<br />

Further studies were dedicated to examine the impact of SYNOP observations in FGAT in<br />

different ways. Possible ways are to use the SYNOPs in every timeslot (there are 7 slots in the<br />

6 hour assimilation window) or just the one observed at analysis time. The results reflect that<br />

a better analysis and forecast is provided if only that SYNOP report is assimilated which was<br />

observed at the analysis time.<br />

Observation use<br />

During the first half of the year the main emphasis was put to the use of AMV (Atmospheric<br />

Motion Vectors) data from MSG. The goal was to find the optimal use of these data with two<br />

degrees of freedom given by the quality index of the data and the usability over land and sea.<br />

The quality indexes (QI) are provided according to the actual quality of each observation. As<br />

the number of available observation is decreasing with an increasing QI, it is the user’s choice<br />

to set the optimal QI to be used. Concerning the usage of the data over land and sea, we<br />

should mention that in the global ARPEGE model, AMV data are used uniquely over sea.<br />

However as the European domain used at the Hungarian Meteorological Service (HMS)<br />

includes mainly land surface, experiments were run using these high-resolution data over land<br />

as well. Altogether 3 experiments were run within the Hungarian 3DVAR system (WDEF: QI<br />

> 85%, data only over sea, W80P: QI>80%, data only over sea, WLAN: QI>85% data over<br />

sea + land). The reference was the operational 3DVAR suite (NAM2). Results show that the<br />

AMV data have a good impact on the analysis and the forecast especially for geopotential and<br />

wind but also for humidity through the multivariate Jb (Fig 3). It can also be concluded, that<br />

adding the AMV data over land can further improve the forecast (Fig. 4).<br />

204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!