21.06.2015 Views

Proceedings - C-SRNWP Project

Proceedings - C-SRNWP Project

Proceedings - C-SRNWP Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

many stations (Fig. 2b). In the single-station scatter plots, this results in vertical bands (Fig.<br />

2c), caused by channeled flow that shows widely varying wind directions in the model.<br />

a) Observations b) aLMo2 analyses c)<br />

Figure 2: Wind-direction: Histograms of a) observations and b) aLMo analyses; c) scatter-plot model versus<br />

observation (Site: Plaffeien)<br />

aLMo2 tends to over-predict the wind speed in general, and specifically at locally influenced,<br />

sheltered stations. Only few mountain-top stations are underestimated, because the gridaverage<br />

in the model does not represent the local acceleration effect of a mountain top.<br />

Overall, the dynamic range of the wind speed in aLMo2 seems too narrow.<br />

This study is a first screening of the quality of aLMo2 near-surface winds. It shows that the<br />

fine-grid aLMo2 is at least as good as or systematically better than the coarser-resolution<br />

aLMo. One can conclude that aLMo2 has the potential to replace the current statistic tool for<br />

simulating local wind.<br />

Thunderstorm–prediction from aLMo output using boosting (D. Perler and O.<br />

Marchand)<br />

Introduction<br />

We present a new approach to weather model output interpretation. We use Adaptive<br />

Boosting [FS97] to train a set of simple base classifiers with historical data from weather<br />

model output, SYNOP messages and lightning data. The resulting overall method then<br />

interprets weather model forecast output and generates for each timestep and gridpoint a<br />

certainty measure between zero and one for how likely a thunderstorm is to occur. We<br />

compare resulting cross–validation scores to existing systems and approaches and find that we<br />

can significantly improve the POD to 72% and FAR to 34%. The method has several<br />

advantages over existing approaches, namely expert systems and other statistical methods:<br />

• the superior cross–validation results,<br />

• the short learning time (less than 10 minutes sequential runtime for our experiments<br />

on a standard PC),<br />

• the possibility to interpret the results of the underlying statistical analysis, and,<br />

• the simplicity to add any predictors to a running system.<br />

Boosting<br />

Boosting is a new approach to machine learning that employs the power of many simple<br />

classification schemes called base classifiers. These base classifiers then take a vote for the<br />

final classification 2 . Depending on the training performance the base classifiers receive a<br />

2 Much like the Ask-the-audience option (joker of the game) in the popular TV “Who wants to be a millionaire?”<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!