G MS THESIS_final version_Maxim Prokudin.pdf - Digital Repository ...

110Figure 71 and Figure 72 outline the tabulated data in graphical format, where Figure 71shows the relationship between eh calculated design bearing capacity values and the bearingcapacity obtained during the actual testing. The calculated design to actual bearing capacityratio was also computed and displayed in the figure. Figure 72 shows the linear relationshipbetween design (calculated) and actual bearing capacity values.25001.2Bearing Capacity (kPa)20001500100050000.7*ActualCalculated0.61.0Sand 305Sand 610RAP 6100.60.8305 - 305 mm (short pier)610 - 610 mm (long pier)0.7* - Design to actual bear.cap. ratioRAP 305Loess cem fib 305Loess cem fib 610C(I)+C(K) 305C(I)+C(K) 610C(I)+C(K)+NS7 305C(I)+C(K)+NS7 610C(I)+NS7 305C(I)+NS7 610Figure 71: Calculated design versus actual bearing capacity values for single piers ofvarious composition (bar chart)0.90.80.80.90.70.8