G MS THESIS_final version_Maxim Prokudin.pdf - Digital Repository ...

viiiFigure 62: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long aggregatepiers with cemented top 100 mm. ......................................................................................97Figure 63: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long pierscomposed of loess and fibers .............................................................................................98Figure 64: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long pierscomposed of loess and cement ...........................................................................................99Figure 65: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long pierscomposed of loess, cement and fibers..............................................................................100Figure 66: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long pierscomposed of cement type I and K ....................................................................................101Figure 67: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long pierscomposed of cement type I, K and NS7 ..........................................................................102Figure 68: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long pierscomposed of cement type I and NS7 ...............................................................................103Figure 69: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long pierscomposed of sand .............................................................................................................104Figure 70: Overall stress-settlement test results for all (a) 305 mm and (b) 610 mm longsingle piers of various composition .................................................................................105Figure 71: Calculated design versus actual bearing capacity values for single piers of variouscomposition (bar chart) ....................................................................................................110Figure 72: Calculated design versus actual bearing capacity for single piers of variouscomposition (scatter chart) ...............................................................................................111Figure 73: Stress-settlement test results for matrix soil used for placement of aggregate piergroups ...............................................................................................................................112Figure 74: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long singleaggregate piers .................................................................................................................113Figure 75: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long aggregatepiers unit cell ....................................................................................................................114Figure 76: Stress-settlement test results(a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long groups oftwo aggregate piers ..........................................................................................................115Figure 77: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long groups offour aggregate piers..........................................................................................................116Figure 78: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long groups offive aggregate piers ..........................................................................................................117Figure 79: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long groups ofsix aggregate piers............................................................................................................118Figure 80: Overall stress-settlement test results for all (a) 305 mm and (b) 610 mm longaggregate piers .................................................................................................................119Figure 81: Bearing capacity values compared between laboratory and field tested footings(single pier, group of four and group of five footings) ....................................................123Figure 81: Stress-settlement test results for matrix soil used for placement of C(I) + C(K)groups of piers..................................................................................................................125Figure 83: Stress-settlement test results for 305 mm and (610 mm group of four was nottested due to technical difficulties) ..................................................................................125Figure 82: Stress-settlement test results (a) for 305 mm and (b) for 610 mm long single C(I)