163Black, J.A., Sivakumar, V., Madhav, M.R., and Hanill, G.A. (2007). ―Reinforced StoneColumns in Weak Deposits: Laboratory Model Study.‖ Journal of Geotechnical andGeoenvironmental Engineering. Vol 133, No. 9, p. 1154-1161.Black, J., Sivakumar, V., and McKinley, J.D. (2007). ―Performance of Clay SamplesReinforced with Vertical Granular Columns.‖ Canadian Geotechnical Journal. Vol 44, p.89-95.Bowles, J.E. (1978). ―Engineering Properties of Soils and their Measurements.‖ McGraw-Hill, Inc. USA.Bucher, S., Bullard, J., and Parra, J.R. (2008). ―Comparison of Load results and Performanceof the Rammed Geopier System in Undocumented Fill in Urban Areas.‖ 15 th Annual GreatLakes geotechnical/Geoenvironmental Conference, Carmel, IN.Burnham, T., and Johnson, D. (1993). ―In-Situ Foundation Characterization Using theDynamic Cone Penetrometer.‖ Final Report MN/RD-93/05, Minnesota Department ofTransportation, St. Paul, MN.Construction of Great Pyramids (2002). ―Mystic Places.‖ World Mysteries.http://www.world-mysteries.com/mpl_2_1asok.htm (Oct. 30, 2009)Cox, W.R., Dixon, D.A., and Murphy, B.S. (1984). ―Lateral-load Tests on 25.4mm DiameterPiles in Very Soft Clay in Side-by-side and in-line Groups.‖ Laterally Loaded DeepFoundations: Analysis and Performance, ASTM STP 835, p. 122-139.Das, B.M. (2006). ―Principles of Geotechnical Engineering.‖ McGraw-Hill, Inc. USA.Fang, Z., and Yin, H. (2007). ―Responses of Excess Pore Water Pressure in Soft Marine Clayaround a Soil Cement Column.‖ International Journal of Geomechanics. Vol 7, No. 167, 9.167-175.
164FHWA (1999). ―Portland Cement.‖ U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA.http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/materialsgrp/cement.html (Oct. 15, 2007=9).Fox, N.S., and Cowell, M.J. (1998). ―Geopier Foundation and Soil Reinforcement Manual.‖RAP Foundation Manual, RAP Foundation Company, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ.Fox, N.S., Weppler, L.R., and Scherbeck, R. (2004). ―Geopier Soil Reinforcement System –Case Histories of High Bearing Capacity Footing Support and Floor Slab Support.‖ FifthInternational Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, New York, NY.FitzPatrick, B.T., Wissmann, K.J., and White, D.J. (2003). ―Settlement Control forEmbankment and Transportation – Related Structures using Geopeir Soil Reinforcement.‖Technical Bulletin, No.6, Geopier Foundation Co., Inc., Scottsdale, AZ.FitzPatrick, B.T., and Wissmann, K.J. (2002). ―Geopier Shear Reinforcement for GlobalStability and Slope Stability.‖ Technical Bulletin, No.5, Geopier Foundation Co., Inc.,Scottsdale, AZ.FitzPatrick, B.T., and Wissmann, K.J. (2006). ―Vibration and Noise Levels.‖ TechnicalBulletin, No.9, GEOPIER Foundation Co., Inc., Scottsdale, AZ.GFC Newsletter (2000). ―The Ice House Hackensack, New Jersey.‖ News Letter, GEOPIERFoundation Company, Mooresville, NC. http://o.b5z.net/i/u/10034179/i/G-H001_LR.<strong>pdf</strong>(Oct. 18, 2009).Handy R.L., and Spangler, M.G. (2007). ―Geotechnical Engineering Soil and FoundationPrinciples and Practice.‖ McGraw-Hill, Inc. USA.Handy, R.L. (1973). ―Collapsible Loess in Iowa.‖ Soil Science Society of America Journal,Vol 37, Ames, IA, p. 281-284.Handy, R.L. (2001). ―Does Lateral Stress Really Influence Settlement?‖ ASCE Journal ofGeotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. Vol 127, No. 7, Ames, IA, p. 623-636.
- Page 1:
Engineering behavior of small-scale
- Page 6 and 7:
viLIST OF FIGURESFigure 1: Concept
- Page 8 and 9:
viiiFigure 62: Stress-settlement te
- Page 10 and 11:
xLIST OF TABLESTable 1: Stiffness m
- Page 12 and 13:
xiiLIST OF EQUATIONSEquation 1: Ult
- Page 14 and 15:
xivSymbol Description Unitsγ dry l
- Page 16 and 17:
1CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTIONIndustry Pr
- Page 22 and 23:
7MAKECAVITYPLACESTONE ATBOTTOM OFCA
- Page 24 and 25:
9Normal Stress, kPaShear Stress. kP
- Page 26 and 27:
11pier element for a maximum of 25
- Page 28 and 29:
13savings provided by the system (A
- Page 30 and 31:
15The bearing capacity accredited t
- Page 32 and 33:
17Equation 12: Load resistance prov
- Page 34 and 35:
19Soil conditions at the site were
- Page 36 and 37:
Settlement (mm)Settlement (mm)10202
- Page 38 and 39:
23Site soil conditions were describ
- Page 40 and 41:
25Article#ReferenceTable 2: Case st
- Page 42 and 43:
27Article#7ReferenceHughes andWithe
- Page 44 and 45:
29replaced with method of freezing
- Page 46 and 47:
UNREINFORCED COLUMNNO COLUMNREINFOR
- Page 48 and 49:
33The load carrying capacity was fo
- Page 50 and 51:
35Case 5 - Bachus and Barksdale, 19
- Page 52 and 53:
37full depth of the consolidated la
- Page 54 and 55:
39CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGYCr
- Page 56 and 57:
41itself was designed to be support
- Page 58 and 59:
43While it is obvious that the chan
- Page 60 and 61:
45To perform all the required testi
- Page 62 and 63:
47In the areas where access was lim
- Page 64 and 65:
49CBR from DCPThe California Bearin
- Page 66 and 67:
305 mm610 mm305 mm610 mm305 mm610 m
- Page 68 and 69:
53The process of using the Shelby t
- Page 70 and 71:
15881556144815591597154915271586158
- Page 72 and 73:
57Table 14: Top and bottom UC loess
- Page 74 and 75:
59Data Collection and SensorsHaving
- Page 76 and 77:
61Micro Epsilon displacement transd
- Page 78 and 79:
63plate down the cavity through man
- Page 80 and 81:
65Beveled Tamper HeadsThe other asp
- Page 82 and 83:
67All, aggregate, cementitious and
- Page 84 and 85:
69DAQ Data CollectionWhile performi
- Page 86 and 87:
71space in the test bed (See Figure
- Page 88 and 89:
73(a)(b)(c)Figure 42: Test bed grou
- Page 90 and 91:
75CHAPTER 4: MATERIALSThe materials
- Page 92 and 93:
7710080LL = 31PI = 7Pass. #200 = 98
- Page 94 and 95:
79the second stage of testing. Mois
- Page 96 and 97:
81Knowing the gradation characteris
- Page 98 and 99:
83More importantly, the performed d
- Page 100 and 101:
85Figure 49: Cement type I compound
- Page 102 and 103:
87As the expansive and contractive
- Page 104 and 105:
89Figure 55: 19 mm polypropylene fi
- Page 106 and 107:
91CHAPTER 5: TEST RESULTS AND ANALY
- Page 108 and 109:
93Applied stress at top of pier (kP
- Page 110 and 111:
95Figure 60: Stress-settlement test
- Page 112 and 113:
97Figure 62: Stress-settlement test
- Page 114 and 115:
99Figure 64: Stress-settlement test
- Page 116 and 117:
101Figure 66: Stress-settlement tes
- Page 118 and 119:
103Figure 68: Stress-settlement tes
- Page 120 and 121:
105Settlement (mm)024681012Applied
- Page 122 and 123:
107to the maximum displacement of 1
- Page 124 and 125:
109The failure mechanism of other p
- Page 126 and 127:
1113000Measured Bearing Capacity (k
- Page 128 and 129: 113Applied stress at bottom of the
- Page 130 and 131: 115Figure 76: Stress-settlement tes
- Page 132 and 133: 117Figure 78: Stress-settlement tes
- Page 134 and 135: 119Settlement (mm)0246810Applied st
- Page 136 and 137: 121The group efficiency results wer
- Page 138 and 139: 123Pier typeAggregate PierUnit Cell
- Page 140 and 141: 125Figure 82: Stress-settlement tes
- Page 142 and 143: 127Figure 85: Stress-settlement tes
- Page 144 and 145: 129Figure 87: Stress-settlement tes
- Page 146 and 147: 131Applied stress at bottom of the
- Page 148 and 149: 133Table 33: Group efficiency compa
- Page 150 and 151: 135Having a limited amount of exper
- Page 152 and 153: 137Stiffness, kPa/mm600500400300200
- Page 154 and 155: 139In case with the piers consistin
- Page 156 and 157: 141Table 36: Stiffness ratio calcul
- Page 158 and 159: 143Some of the loess composition pi
- Page 160 and 161: 145Pier typeAggregatePierSingle Pie
- Page 162 and 163: 147Another observation was made, wh
- Page 164 and 165: 149As previously outlined, the stif
- Page 166 and 167: 151pier group efficiency values wer
- Page 168 and 169: Stiffness Ratio1538Figure 91: Stiff
- Page 170 and 171: 155CHAPTER 7: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIO
- Page 172 and 173: 157MaterialsLoess-CementVery intrig
- Page 174 and 175: 159Groups of PiersGroup of Aggregat
- Page 176 and 177: 161CHAPTER 8: FUTURE RESEARCHThe fu
- Page 180 and 181: 165Hanlong, L., An, D., and Yang, S
- Page 182 and 183: 167Randrup T.B., and Lichter, J.M.
- Page 184 and 185: 169Yeh, Y.K., and Mo, Y.L. (2005).
- Page 186 and 187: 171Group EfficiencyAggregate Pier G
- Page 188 and 189: 173Aggregate Pier305mm Wedge HeadDC
- Page 190 and 191: 175Loess + Fibers305mm Single PierD
- Page 192 and 193: 177Sand305mm Single PierDCPI, mm/bl
- Page 194 and 195: 179Aggregate Pier305mm Group of 4DC
- Page 196 and 197: 181C(I) + C(K)305mm Group of 4DCPI,
- Page 198 and 199: 183Aggregate Pier305mm Wedge HeadCB
- Page 200 and 201: 185Loess + Fibers305mm Single PierC
- Page 202 and 203: 187Sand305mm Single PierCBR, %0 2 4
- Page 204 and 205: 189Aggregate Pier305mm Group of 4CB
- Page 206 and 207: 191C(I) + C(K)305mm Group of 4CBR,