10.07.2015 Views

2.1 Overview of the Proposed Project - Keystone XL pipeline - US ...

2.1 Overview of the Proposed Project - Keystone XL pipeline - US ...

2.1 Overview of the Proposed Project - Keystone XL pipeline - US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement<strong>Keystone</strong> <strong>XL</strong> <strong>Project</strong><strong>2.1</strong>.12.2 Big Bend to Witten 230-kV Transmission LineAfter receipt <strong>of</strong> information on <strong>the</strong> power requirements for <strong>the</strong> proposed pump stations in SouthDakota, Western Area Power Administration (Western) conducted a joint system engineeringstudy to determine system reliability under <strong>the</strong> proposed loads at full <strong>Project</strong> electrical energyconsumption. Engineering studies determined that a 230-kV transmission line would be requiredto support voltage requirements for pump stations 20 and 21 in <strong>the</strong> Witten area when <strong>the</strong>proposed <strong>Project</strong> is operating at maximum capacity (Figure <strong>2.1</strong>.12-2). To address thisrequirement, Western proposes to replace <strong>the</strong> existing Big Bend-Fort Thompson No. 2 230kVTransmission Line Turning Structure located on <strong>the</strong> south side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam, construct a newdouble circuit 230 kV transmission line for approximately 1 mile south west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dam, andconstruct a new Lower Brule Substation. These actions are part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger Big Bend to Witten230 kV Transmission Line <strong>Project</strong>.Basin Electric Power Cooperative (BEPC) is proposing to construct and operate a new singlecircuit 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission line in south-central South Dakota that would extend froma new substation (Lower Brule Substation) south <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Big Bend Dam on Lake Sharpeapproximately 74 miles south-southwest to <strong>the</strong> existing Witten Substation located south <strong>of</strong> U.S.Highway 18.The approximate 76-mile Big Bend to Witten 230-kV Transmission <strong>Project</strong>(<strong>Project</strong>) consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> aforementioned elements. The new Big Bend to Witten 230 kVtransmission line would be built, owned, and operated by BEPC. The Witten Substation wouldalso need to be expanded to accommodate <strong>the</strong> new switching equipment associated with <strong>the</strong> BigBend to Witten 230-kV transmission line (see Appendix J, Basin Electric Big Bend to Witten230-kV Transmission <strong>Project</strong> Routing Report)The <strong>Project</strong> is located within Lyman and Tripp counties in south-central South Dakota.Approximately 6 miles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> single-circuit transmission line and all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> double-circuittransmission line, as well as Western’s Lower Brule Substation, would be constructed on <strong>the</strong>Lower Brule Indian Reservation (see Figure <strong>2.1</strong>.12-2). The proposed Lower Brule Substationwould occupy approximately 16 acres <strong>of</strong> land. The existing Witten Substation would beexpanded immediately to <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast to accommodate <strong>the</strong> new 230-kV connection. The newpart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> substation would have a separate access road and would be separated by a fence from<strong>the</strong> existing Witten Substation.BEPC has applied to <strong>the</strong> U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture’s Rural Utility Service (R<strong>US</strong>) forfinancing and proposes to construct and operate <strong>the</strong> <strong>Project</strong> to meet existing and future electricpower requirements in south central South Dakota. BEPC would interconnect <strong>the</strong> newtransmission line to <strong>the</strong> existing Western transmission system. Under R<strong>US</strong> regulations forimplementation <strong>of</strong> NEPA, an Environmental Assessment with scoping is being prepared toassess potential impacts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed action on <strong>the</strong> human and natural environment. R<strong>US</strong> isresponsible for NEPA compliance and related statutes for <strong>the</strong> proposed <strong>Project</strong>. Since <strong>the</strong> <strong>Project</strong>would be constructed partly on <strong>the</strong> Lower Brule Indian Reservation, o<strong>the</strong>r cooperating agenciesmay be identified. R<strong>US</strong> is <strong>the</strong> lead agency and Western is participating as <strong>the</strong> cooperatingagency. Figure <strong>2.1</strong>.12-2 shows <strong>the</strong> proposed route and two alternative routes currently underconsideration in <strong>the</strong> Environmental Assessment process.The proposed <strong>Project</strong> would transfer power from Western’s transmission system near Big BendDam to Rosebud Electric Cooperative’s Witten Substation, near Witten, South Dakota. It isanticipated that some communication facility additions or enhancements may be necessary for<strong>Project</strong> Description <strong>2.1</strong>-77 March 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!