10.07.2015 Views

2.1 Overview of the Proposed Project - Keystone XL pipeline - US ...

2.1 Overview of the Proposed Project - Keystone XL pipeline - US ...

2.1 Overview of the Proposed Project - Keystone XL pipeline - US ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement<strong>Keystone</strong> <strong>XL</strong> <strong>Project</strong>Decommissioning activities would have to be conducted consistent with all applicable regulatoryrequirements that are in place at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> decommissioning. Since regulations at <strong>the</strong> federal,state, and local level change over time, it would be highly speculative to estimate whatregulatory framework would apply to <strong>the</strong> proposed <strong>Project</strong> decommissioning at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>useful life <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed <strong>Project</strong> more than 50 years in <strong>the</strong> future.Prior to decommissioning <strong>the</strong> proposed <strong>Project</strong>, <strong>Keystone</strong> would identify <strong>the</strong> decommissioningprocedures it would use along each portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> route, identify <strong>the</strong> regulations it would berequired to comply with, and submit applications for <strong>the</strong> appropriate environmental permits. Atthat point, <strong>Keystone</strong> and <strong>the</strong> issuing agencies would address <strong>the</strong> environmental impacts <strong>of</strong>implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decommissioning procedures and identify <strong>the</strong> mitigation measuresrequired to avoid or minimize impacts.It is likely that after decommissioning <strong>the</strong>re would be fewer land use restrictions than duringoperation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed <strong>Project</strong> since ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> ROW would no longer have strictencroachment limitations for protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> purged <strong>pipeline</strong>, or <strong>the</strong> <strong>pipeline</strong> may have beenremoved and <strong>the</strong>re would no longer be limitations <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> former ROW.As noted above, PHMSA regulations require that hazardous liquids <strong>pipeline</strong>s be purged <strong>of</strong>combustibles prior to decommissioning. Therefore <strong>the</strong> potential for <strong>the</strong> release <strong>of</strong> contaminantsfrom <strong>the</strong> decommissioned <strong>pipeline</strong> would be negligible.<strong>2.1</strong>.14 Referencesexp Energy Services, Inc. 2012a. TransCanada <strong>Keystone</strong> <strong>XL</strong> Pipeline <strong>Project</strong> SupplementalEnvironmental Report for <strong>the</strong> Nebraska Reroute. Document Number K<strong>XL</strong>-TAL-1005­002. Tallahassee, FL. September 5, 2012.___________. 2012b. TransCanada <strong>Keystone</strong> <strong>XL</strong> Pipeline <strong>Project</strong> Environmental Report.Document Number K<strong>XL</strong>-TAL-1005-002. Tallahassee, FL. September 7, 2012.National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). 2012. Enbridge Incorporated. Hazardous LiquidPipeline Ruptured and Release. Marshall, Michigan, July 25, 2010. Accident Report.NTSB/PAR-12/01, PB2012-916501. July 10, 2012.NTSB. See National Transportation Safety Board.TransCanada <strong>Keystone</strong> Pipeline LP (TC). 2012. Application to DOS for a Presidential Permit.May 4, 2012.<strong>Project</strong> Description <strong>2.1</strong>-88 March 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!