10.07.2015 Views

Assessment of the Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge - FTP Directory ...

Assessment of the Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge - FTP Directory ...

Assessment of the Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge - FTP Directory ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The main bridge from Bent 1 to Pier 4 includes one main span and two side spans <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>cable-stayed structure. It is separated from <strong>the</strong> Illinois approach by an expansion joint ontop <strong>of</strong> Pier 4. At <strong>the</strong> expansion joints, <strong>the</strong> main bridge and <strong>the</strong> Illinois approach have <strong>the</strong>same displacement in <strong>the</strong> transverse direction but independent longitudinal moment,resulting in a relatively weak connection between two parts. Those channels in Table 3.1,which are located on <strong>the</strong> main bridge, are re-listed in Table 3.2. A total <strong>of</strong> 32 stations and67 channels are on <strong>the</strong> main bridge. Among <strong>the</strong> 32 stations, D1, D2 and D3 are located at<strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> foundation. The records at <strong>the</strong>se stations approximately represent <strong>the</strong> rockmotion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bridge during earthquakes.Table 3.2Designation <strong>of</strong> station and channels for main bridgeStation Channels Station Channels Station Channels7405.B1 HN2 HN3 HNZ 7405.L6 HN2 HNZ 7405.R1 HNZ7405.C1 HNZ 7405.M1 HN3 7405.R2 HN2 HNZ7405.C2 HN2 HNZ 7405.M2 HN2 HN3 7405.R3 HNZ7405.D1 HN2 HN3 HNZ 7405.M3 HN3 7405.R4 HN2 HNZ7405.D2 HN2 HN3 HNZ 7405.M4 HN2 HN3 7405.R5 HNZ7405.D3 HN2 HN3 HNZ 7405.P1 HN3 7405.R6 HN2 HNZ7405.L1 HNZ 7405.P2 HN2 HN3 7405.T1 HN2 HN37405.L2 HN2 HNZ 7405.P3 HN3 7405.T2 HN2 HN37405.L3 HNZ 7405.P4 HN2 HN3 7405.T3 HN2 HN37405.L4 HN2 HNZ 7405.P5 HNZ 7405.T4 HN2 HN37405.L5 HNZ 7405.P6 HN2 HN3 HNZ Station=32; Channels= 673.3. Measured dataThe dynamic responses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bridge induced by earthquake excitations and traffic loadscan be obtained from <strong>the</strong> seismic instrumentation system. In this section, some responsedata from <strong>the</strong> system are analyzed. Two sets <strong>of</strong> field-measured data were selected. Oneset is two minutes <strong>of</strong> traffic-induced vibration data in a time period from 19:20′40″ to19:22′40″ on July 25, 2006. Although a Richter’s Magnitude 2.2 earthquake occurred at19:35′39″ (Universal Time) on July 25, 2006, in sou<strong>the</strong>astern Missouri (36.76N and89.49W), <strong>the</strong> response at <strong>the</strong> bridge site was negligible. The o<strong>the</strong>r set <strong>of</strong> data was inducedby an earthquake event, which occurred at 12:37′32″ on May 1, 2005 with a Richter'sMagnitude 4.1. The epicenter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earthquake was located at four miles SSE (162 o )from Manila, Arkansas and 180 km (111 miles) from <strong>the</strong> bridge. The hypocentral depthwas estimated to be 10 km (6.2 miles). This section presents an analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vertical,transverse, and longitudinal acceleration responses at <strong>the</strong> bridge deck and towers. In <strong>the</strong>following section, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> corresponding amplitude spectra at various deck and towerlocations will be presented to compare with <strong>the</strong> frequencies obtained from numericalsimulations.3.3.1. Vertical vibration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bridge deckThe vertical accelerations induced by traffic along <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bridge deck areillustrated in Figure 3.2 for channels L2, L4, C2, R4, and R6 over a period <strong>of</strong> twominutes. It is clearly shown that <strong>the</strong> responses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deck at <strong>the</strong> towers (Channels L4 andR4) are much smaller than those at o<strong>the</strong>r locations due to <strong>the</strong> vertical support condition19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!