10.07.2015 Views

Assessment of the Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge - FTP Directory ...

Assessment of the Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge - FTP Directory ...

Assessment of the Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge - FTP Directory ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(a) Isotropic view(b) Plan view4.4.3. CablesFigure 4.2Modeling <strong>of</strong> girdersThe vibration <strong>of</strong> cables plays an important role in <strong>the</strong> overall response <strong>of</strong> cable-stayedbridges (Abdel-Ghaffar and Khalifa, 1991; Ali and Abdel-Ghaffer 1995; and Ito, 1987).Therefore, appropriate modeling <strong>of</strong> cables is quite necessary. Ali and Abdel-Ghaffer(1995) also found that <strong>the</strong> natural frequencies <strong>of</strong> cables strongly depend on <strong>the</strong> sag <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>cables. Cables are constructed <strong>of</strong> strands that are made <strong>of</strong> high strength steel wires. Threetypes <strong>of</strong> strand configurations are commercially available. They are: (a) helically-woundstrand, (b) parallel wire strand, and (c) locked coil strand.In <strong>the</strong> <strong>Bill</strong> <strong>Emerson</strong> <strong>Memorial</strong> Cable-stayed <strong>Bridge</strong>, each cable consists <strong>of</strong> 19~54 strands,each 15.7 mm in diameter. Parallel to each o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>se strands are placed inside apolyethylene pipe, grouted and <strong>the</strong>n sealed to form a single cable. In this bridge, <strong>the</strong>re are atotal <strong>of</strong> 128 cables in <strong>the</strong> main span. In <strong>the</strong> FE model, <strong>the</strong>se cables were simulated byFrame/Cable element, assuming <strong>the</strong> contribution <strong>of</strong> every internal wire inside <strong>the</strong> cable.The modeling <strong>of</strong> cables is a difficult task because nonlinearities arise from <strong>the</strong> sagging <strong>of</strong>cables. The stiffness, <strong>the</strong>refore, changes with <strong>the</strong> applied load. Each cable element wasrestrained in compression to prevent any compression deformation and to simulate itspractical condition on <strong>the</strong> actual bridge. Since each cable is attached at one end to <strong>the</strong> topflange <strong>of</strong> one composite steel girder and at <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r end to <strong>the</strong> work point <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tower,both attachment points are away from <strong>the</strong> neutral axes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir respective supportingstructural elements (deck and tower). Therefore, two rigid links were introduced to connect<strong>the</strong> cable to <strong>the</strong> neutral axis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> deck and <strong>the</strong> tower, respectively. The use <strong>of</strong> rigid linksensures that <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical lengths, horizontal angles, and <strong>the</strong> maximum sag <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cablesare exactly <strong>the</strong> same as designed. The dimensions and section properties <strong>of</strong> all cables aregiven in Table 4.3. The cable number can be seen in Figure 4.4.44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!