10.07.2015 Views

Assessment of the Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge - FTP Directory ...

Assessment of the Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge - FTP Directory ...

Assessment of the Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge - FTP Directory ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 5.5Natural frequencies for various degrees <strong>of</strong> approachinvolvementModeNo.withapproachk=0(kN/m)84×10(kN/m)72×10(kN/m)62×10(kN/m)52×10(kN/m)42×10(kN/m)1 0.339 0.339 0.340 0.340 0.339 0.339 0.3392 0.400 0.398 0.402 0.401 0.401 0.401 0.3993 0.484 0.484 0.485 0.485 0.484 0.484 0.4844 0.573 0.573 0.573 0.573 0.573 0.573 0.5735 0.602 0.602 0.602 0.602 0.602 0.602 0.6026 0.625 0.610 0.615 0.614 0.612 0.610 0.6107 0.658 0.657 0.658 0.658 0.658 0.658 0.6578 0.689 0.688 0.690 0.690 0.690 0.690 0.6899 0.740 0.739 0.740 0.740 0.740 0.740 0.73910 0.828 0.826 0.827 0.827 0.827 0.826 0.82611 0.842 0.827 0.829 0.829 0.829 0.829 0.82812 0.853 0.842 0.842 0.842 0.842 0.842 0.84213 0.878 0.878 0.878 0.878 0.878 0.878 0.87814 0.915 0.908 0.917 0.917 0.917 0.917 0.91215 0.931 0.931 0.931 0.931 0.931 0.931 0.93116 0.935 0.935 0.935 0.935 0.935 0.935 0.93517 0.935 0.935 0.935 0.935 0.935 0.935 0.93518 0.948 0.945 0.947 0.947 0.947 0.947 0.94619 0.954 0.952 0.953 0.953 0.953 0.953 0.95320 0.957 0.954 0.954 0.954 0.954 0.954 0.95421 0.962 0.962 0.962 0.962 0.962 0.962 0.96222 0.964 0.964 0.964 0.964 0.964 0.964 0.96423 0.965 0.965 0.965 0.965 0.965 0.965 0.96524 0.965 0.965 0.965 0.965 0.965 0.965 0.96525 0.965 0.965 0.966 0.966 0.966 0.966 0.96526 0.977 0.977 0.977 0.977 0.977 0.977 0.97727 1.018 1.018 1.018 1.018 1.018 1.018 1.01828 1.018 1.018 1.018 1.018 1.018 1.018 1.01829 1.031 1.031 1.031 1.031 1.031 1.031 1.03130 1.040 1.039 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.040 1.0395.3.4. Influence <strong>of</strong> pile foundationThree cases are considered to investigate <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> pile foundations in <strong>the</strong> approachspans. The first case is to model <strong>the</strong> support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> piers in <strong>the</strong> approach spans as springsand dashpots in vertical, longitudinal, and traffic directions. This case is supposed tosimulate <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> group pile foundations. The second case is to fix <strong>the</strong> bases <strong>of</strong> allpiers to restrain motions in all degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom. The third case is to model <strong>the</strong> bases <strong>of</strong>piers as hinges. The frequencies obtained for <strong>the</strong> three cases are listed in Table 5.6. Theyare also compared in Figure 5.38. It is clearly seen from Figure 5.38 that <strong>the</strong>re is basically68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!