11.07.2015 Views

draft - DOE Oak Ridge Operations - U.S. Department of Energy

draft - DOE Oak Ridge Operations - U.S. Department of Energy

draft - DOE Oak Ridge Operations - U.S. Department of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix C – SC-Wide Collaborative Projects1. INFORMATION ARCHITECTUREPurpose/Description: To develop an SC-wide architecture (i.e., blueprint) that willprovide direction for HQ, CH, OAK, ORO, and OSTI in the development andimplementation <strong>of</strong> integrated/compatible information systems and technologies. Thearchitecture will be developed using the Steven Spewak Enterprise ArchitecturePlanning (EAP) process. The process requires that the following “pieces” be addressed:(1) Principles; (2) Business Modeling; (3) Current Systems and Technology; (4) DataArchitecture; (5) Application Architecture; (6) Technology Architecture; and (7)Implementation/Migration Plan.DRAFTStrategy/Approach: Discussions (to date) have identified two alternative approaches todeveloping an SC-wide architecture. The gist <strong>of</strong> Alternative #1 is to develop individualarchitectures at each <strong>of</strong> the 5 SC sites and then to bring them together to be integrated.The thrust <strong>of</strong> Alternative #2 begins with the concept <strong>of</strong> one SC-wide business modelfrom which one SC architecture is developed. A 1-1 ½ day meeting is scheduled inSeptember/October for all sites to discuss (with an EAP expert consultant to provideassistance). From an enterprise-wide perspective, this is SC’s highest prioritycollaborative project.Major Objective: An SC corporate IM strategic plan (based on the SC-wide IA) bySeptember 30, 2000. Interim objectives are: (1) an EAP workshop by December 31,1999; (2) all EAP “pieces (for all sites) documented by February 29, 2000; and (3) anSC-wide information architecture by June 30, 2000.Lead Responsibility: SC HQ, because <strong>of</strong> its successful experience in developing aninformation architecture, will have the lead on this project. A significant commitment <strong>of</strong>time by the IT staff and business customers at each site is required for success.Estimated Cost: $1-1 1/2M (in FY2000) plus support from the CIO’s departmentalarchitecture project.2. CORPORATE SYSTEMSPurpose/Description: To establish and maintain a baseline <strong>of</strong> SC’s current informationsystems environment from which duplicative, best-in-class, and corporate potentialsystems can be identified.Strategy/Approach: Each SC site will provide a list <strong>of</strong> currently supported informationsystems (to be maintained in one central location). For each system, the following<strong>Oak</strong> <strong>Ridge</strong> <strong>Operations</strong>Information Management Plan8/5/97 C-1Revision 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!