white rose oilfield development application - Husky Energy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Statistical estimates of probable loss of life for both the FPSO and semi-submersible options arepredicted to be primarily related to loss of hydrocarbon containment (fire, explosion and relatedevacuation fatalities). Other possible contributions to probable loss of life on both the FPSO and semisubmersibleoptions are a helicopter crash, ship collision or structural failure. Highest risks relate to lossof hydrocarbon containment or helicopter crash. However, in both cases, the statistical risks are low andwithin parameters of other existing offshore operations.7.2.2.3 Environmental RiskThe frequency of occurrence for a significant oil spill (that is, a spill exceeding 8 m 3 (50 barrels)) issimilar for both the FPSO and semi-submersible options, with the estimated frequency for both optionsbeing well within the specified target levels of safety for the project.7.2.2.4 Safety Function ImpairmentImpairment frequencies have been calculated for the temporary safe refuge, with the estimatedfrequency being lower than the target safety level. Impairment of the refuge is minimized by placing afirewall between the temporary safe refuge and the process modules.Impairment frequencies for the primary structure, escape routes and means of evacuation have not beenquantified at this stage due to the many design uncertainties that remain. The requirements of the safetyfunction impairment criteria for these features will all be met during the detailed design stage throughappropriate selection of materials, components and design features.White Rose DA Project Summary • January 2001 Page 108
8 REFERENCESJWEL (Jacques Whitford Environment Limited). 2000. White Rose Oilfield Development PublicConsultation Report. White Rose Development Application, Prepared for <strong>Husky</strong> Oil OperationsLimited, St. John’s, NF.CEAA (Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency). 1994. Responsible Authority's Guide. Ministerof Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, ON.C-NOPB (Canada-Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board). 1988. Development ApplicationGuidelines: Newfoundland Offshore Area. Canada-Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board, StJohn's, NF.C-NOPB (Canada-Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board). 2000. Annual Report 1999-2000.Canada Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board, St. John’s, NF.NOIA (Newfoundland Ocean Industries Association). 2000. Conference Proceedings. NewfoundlandOcean Industries Association, St. John’s, NF.Purvin & Gertz Inc. 2000. East Coast Natural Gas Developments and Markets. Prepared for Donahue,Ernst and Young LLP.White Rose DA Project Summary • January 2001 Page 109
Page 1 and 2:
WHITE ROSE OILFIELDDEVELOPMENT APPL
Page 3:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage No.1 INTRODUC
Page 6 and 7:
7.1.5 Command Structure............
Page 8 and 9:
Figure 1.1-1White Rose LocationWhit
Page 10 and 11:
There will be three to four drill c
Page 12 and 13:
1.2.1 Exploration HistoryThe first
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 1.2-2Depletion Schedule for
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 1.2-3United States Import Re
Page 18 and 19:
Figure 1.2-4Selected Natural Gas Pr
Page 20 and 21:
Figure 1.2-6Gas Infrastructure Inve
Page 22 and 23:
Figure 1.2-7Model for Gas Developme
Page 24 and 25:
These remaining five options (steel
Page 26 and 27:
Figure 1.3-2Relative Technical Risk
Page 28 and 29:
In addition, the steel FPSO will:
Page 30 and 31:
This system was evaluated as fourth
Page 32 and 33:
Figure 1.4-1Project Development Sch
Page 34 and 35:
2.1 Regulatory RequirementsThe star
Page 36 and 37:
• project summary booklet, which
Page 38 and 39:
The first series of open houses fea
Page 40 and 41:
2.6 Media BriefingsHusky Oil repres
Page 42 and 43:
3 CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND BENEFITS PLAN
Page 44 and 45:
3.1.2 Canada-Newfoundland Benefit C
Page 46 and 47:
The subsea contract package will co
Page 48 and 49:
3.1.3.6 Monitoring and ReportingHus
Page 50 and 51:
• The operations/production phase
Page 52 and 53:
• Husky Oil’s preferred develop
Page 54 and 55:
4.1.2 White Rose Structural Geology
Page 56 and 57:
4.2.1.3 West Avalon PoolOnly one we
Page 58 and 59:
Reducing oil handling capacities ha
Page 60 and 61:
4.2.2.7 Reservoir ManagementReservo
Page 62 and 63:
Side scan sonar images of the White
Page 64 and 65: Generators will be sized to meet th
Page 66 and 67: 4.5.3 Marine Support VesselsHusky O
Page 68 and 69: The offshore organization will cons
Page 70 and 71: Husky Oil promotes safe operations
Page 72 and 73: Table 4.8-3Capital and Operating Co
Page 74 and 75: 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTThe
Page 76 and 77: The principal origins of the iceber
Page 78 and 79: white hake and winter flounder. The
Page 80 and 81: Produced water, although treated pr
Page 82 and 83: opportunity for interaction with bi
Page 84 and 85: The effects of project development,
Page 86 and 87: Additional mitigation measures for
Page 88 and 89: In summary, after mitigation measur
Page 90 and 91: 6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENTTh
Page 92 and 93: 6.1.2.1 EducationIn recent years, t
Page 94 and 95: 6.1.3.1 HousingThe number of dwelli
Page 96 and 97: Figure 6.1-1NAFO Divisions on the G
Page 98: During the development phase of the
Page 101 and 102: 6.2.3 Community Physical Infrastruc
Page 103 and 104: damage or foul gear. Any damage to
Page 105 and 106: have medical programs for their ope
Page 107 and 108: 7 SAFETY PLAN AND CONCEPT SAFETY AN
Page 109 and 110: Hazard prevention, detection and mi
Page 111 and 112: 7.1.5 Command StructureThe command
Page 113: 7.2.1 Major Hazard IdentificationTh
Page 117 and 118: Adams Pearson Associates Limited. 1
Page 119 and 120: Hycal Energy Research Laboratories
Page 121: Schlumberger. 2000. Husky Oil et al
show all

white rose oilfield development application - Husky Energy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?