white rose oilfield development application - Husky Energy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 4.8-3Capital and Operating Costs – New Steel Semi-Submersible FacilityProductionCapital Costs ($Million)OperatingYear Rate Annual ExplorationPre-ProductionPost-Costs(m 3 /d) (1,000 m 3 Total) Drilling Proj. Admin. Drilling Facilities SubSea Production($Million)1 10 120 1302 10 115 420 93 6383 10 155 420 186 7714 14,600 4,000 41 240 93 114 488 625 14,600 5,340 155 155 876 14,600 5,340 120 120 937 14,600 5,340 968 13,000 4,780 1039 8,700 3,160 10410 5,600 2,060 10111 4,100 1,480 9012 3,100 1,150 8013 2,600 940 7414 2,100 760 6515 1,800 650 5916 1,600 570 5317 1,300 480 5118 1,000 350 1061920TOTAL 36,400 $30 $311 $1,200 $372 $389 $2,302 $1,224Notes:Operating costs exclude crude transportation costs.The final year operating costs include $41 million for abandonment of the facility and wells.The semi-submersible salvage value is estimated at $40 million (as spent).White Rose DA Project Summary • January 2001 Page 66
Table 4.8-4Comparison of FPSO and Semi-Submersible Option CostsSteel FPSO($ Million)Steel Semi-submersible($ Million)P50 Capital ExpendituresCapital (2000$Can)Capital to Project Sanction 310 310Development Capital to First Oil 1,769 1,913Drilling 311 311Total Facility 1,114 1,200Vessel/Turret 462 521Topsides/Installation/Other 652 679SubSea 314 372SGA 30 30Development Capital Post First Oil 390 390Drilling 389 389Abandonment 41 41Salvage Value (40) (40)Total Capital Expenditures 2,469 2,613Total Operating Expenditures 1,087 1,132P90 Capital ExpendituresCapital (2000$Can)Capital to Project Sanction 310 310Development Capital to First Oil 1,906 2,036Drilling 342 342Total Facility 1,198 1,268Vessel/Turret 497 550Topsides/Installation/Other 701 718SubSea 336 396SGA 30 30Development Capital Post First Oil 564 564Drilling 557 557Abandonment 47 47Salvage Value (40) (40)Total Capital Expenditures 2,780 2,910Total Operating Expenditures 1,118 1,163The operating costs are based on the following assumptions:• the reservoir parameters will be as described in the Development Plan;• Husky Oil will operate the development in accordance with a typical joint venture agreement,and will adhere to the management approach and development scenario as set out in theDevelopment Plan; and• relatively stable economic conditions prevailing worldwide in January 2000 will continuethroughout the period of operation.The operating costs shown do not include crude transportation costs. The final year operating costsinclude $41 million for decommissioning and abandonment of the facility and wells for floatingsystems. The salvage value of the two viable options is estimated at $40 million for each (as spent).White Rose DA Project Summary • January 2001 Page 67
Page 1 and 2:
WHITE ROSE OILFIELDDEVELOPMENT APPL
Page 3:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage No.1 INTRODUC
Page 6 and 7:
7.1.5 Command Structure............
Page 8 and 9:
Figure 1.1-1White Rose LocationWhit
Page 10 and 11:
There will be three to four drill c
Page 12 and 13:
1.2.1 Exploration HistoryThe first
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 1.2-2Depletion Schedule for
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 1.2-3United States Import Re
Page 18 and 19:
Figure 1.2-4Selected Natural Gas Pr
Page 20 and 21:
Figure 1.2-6Gas Infrastructure Inve
Page 22 and 23: Figure 1.2-7Model for Gas Developme
Page 24 and 25: These remaining five options (steel
Page 26 and 27: Figure 1.3-2Relative Technical Risk
Page 28 and 29: In addition, the steel FPSO will:
Page 30 and 31: This system was evaluated as fourth
Page 32 and 33: Figure 1.4-1Project Development Sch
Page 34 and 35: 2.1 Regulatory RequirementsThe star
Page 36 and 37: • project summary booklet, which
Page 38 and 39: The first series of open houses fea
Page 40 and 41: 2.6 Media BriefingsHusky Oil repres
Page 42 and 43: 3 CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND BENEFITS PLAN
Page 44 and 45: 3.1.2 Canada-Newfoundland Benefit C
Page 46 and 47: The subsea contract package will co
Page 48 and 49: 3.1.3.6 Monitoring and ReportingHus
Page 50 and 51: • The operations/production phase
Page 52 and 53: • Husky Oil’s preferred develop
Page 54 and 55: 4.1.2 White Rose Structural Geology
Page 56 and 57: 4.2.1.3 West Avalon PoolOnly one we
Page 58 and 59: Reducing oil handling capacities ha
Page 60 and 61: 4.2.2.7 Reservoir ManagementReservo
Page 62 and 63: Side scan sonar images of the White
Page 64 and 65: Generators will be sized to meet th
Page 66 and 67: 4.5.3 Marine Support VesselsHusky O
Page 68 and 69: The offshore organization will cons
Page 70 and 71: Husky Oil promotes safe operations
Page 74 and 75: 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTThe
Page 76 and 77: The principal origins of the iceber
Page 78 and 79: white hake and winter flounder. The
Page 80 and 81: Produced water, although treated pr
Page 82 and 83: opportunity for interaction with bi
Page 84 and 85: The effects of project development,
Page 86 and 87: Additional mitigation measures for
Page 88 and 89: In summary, after mitigation measur
Page 90 and 91: 6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENTTh
Page 92 and 93: 6.1.2.1 EducationIn recent years, t
Page 94 and 95: 6.1.3.1 HousingThe number of dwelli
Page 96 and 97: Figure 6.1-1NAFO Divisions on the G
Page 98: During the development phase of the
Page 101 and 102: 6.2.3 Community Physical Infrastruc
Page 103 and 104: damage or foul gear. Any damage to
Page 105 and 106: have medical programs for their ope
Page 107 and 108: 7 SAFETY PLAN AND CONCEPT SAFETY AN
Page 109 and 110: Hazard prevention, detection and mi
Page 111 and 112: 7.1.5 Command StructureThe command
Page 113 and 114: 7.2.1 Major Hazard IdentificationTh
Page 115 and 116: 8 REFERENCESJWEL (Jacques Whitford
Page 117 and 118: Adams Pearson Associates Limited. 1
Page 119 and 120: Hycal Energy Research Laboratories
Page 121: Schlumberger. 2000. Husky Oil et al
show all

white rose oilfield development application - Husky Energy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?