white rose oilfield development application - Husky Energy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Husky Oil promotes safe operations for personnel and environmental protection as key priorities for alloperations. A loss management program will be in place specific to the White Rose development. It willbecome an integral part of Husky Oil's corporate loss control management philosophy. This philosophy isbased on eliminating or reducing risks to personnel, assets, production, and environment through acontinuous and systematic approach. It covers all aspects related to health and safety, environment,reliability, management of process hazards, risk assessment and loss control.4.8 Development CostsPast expenditures on the White Rose field are shown in Table 4.8-1 by year of occurrence. Expenditurestotalled $345.7 million between 1984 and 1999. All costs are shown in the dollar values of the year inwhich they occurred, and are the gross values before Petroleum Incentive Program (PIP) grants.Table 4.8-1 Past Expenditures (1984 to 1999)YearTotal Expenditures($million as spent)1984 42.11985 66.61986 39.41987 30.81988 47.71989 0.51990 0.319911992199319941995 0.11996 0.31997 5.21998 3.81999 109.2Total 345.7White Rose DA Project Summary • January 2001 Page 64
The capital and operating cost estimates for a new steel FPSO are detailed on an annual basis in Table4.8-2, and capital and operating costs for a new steel semi-submersible are outlined in Table 4.8-3.They are based on 2000 constant dollar estimates prepared by KSLO, and include all applicable customsduties and sales taxes. These are P50 estimates.A comparison of P50 and P90 estimates (that is, a 50 percent and 90 percent probability, respectively, ofachieving this cost or less) for the FPSO and semi-submersible options is provided in Table 4.8-4. Thecapital cost estimates include costs for the following items:• production facility;• subsea facilities;• installation; and• well drilling and completion.Table 4.8-2Capital and Operating Costs – New Steel FPSO FacilityRate(m 3 /d)ProductionAnnual(1,000 m 3 )ExplorationDrillingCapital Costs ($Million)Pre-ProductionOperatingPost-Production Total Costs($Million)YearProj.Admin.Drilling Facilities SubSea1 10 111 1212 10 115 390 82 5973 10 155 390 150 7054 14,600 4,000 41 223 82 114 460 595 14,600 5,340 155 155 836 14,600 5,340 120 120 897 14,600 5,340 928 13,000 4,780 999 8,700 3,160 10010 5,600 2,060 9711 4,100 1,480 8612 3,100 1,150 7713 2,600 940 7114 2,100 760 6315 1,800 650 5716 1,600 570 5117 1,300 480 4918 1,000 350 1041920TOTAL 36,400 $30 $311 $1,114 $314 $389 $2,158 $1,177Notes:Operating costs exclude crude transportation costs.The final year operating costs include $41 million for abandonment of the facility and wells.The FPSO salvage value is estimated at $40 million (as spent).White Rose DA Project Summary • January 2001 Page 65
Page 1 and 2:
WHITE ROSE OILFIELDDEVELOPMENT APPL
Page 3:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage No.1 INTRODUC
Page 6 and 7:
7.1.5 Command Structure............
Page 8 and 9:
Figure 1.1-1White Rose LocationWhit
Page 10 and 11:
There will be three to four drill c
Page 12 and 13:
1.2.1 Exploration HistoryThe first
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 1.2-2Depletion Schedule for
Page 16 and 17:
Figure 1.2-3United States Import Re
Page 18 and 19:
Figure 1.2-4Selected Natural Gas Pr
Page 20 and 21: Figure 1.2-6Gas Infrastructure Inve
Page 22 and 23: Figure 1.2-7Model for Gas Developme
Page 24 and 25: These remaining five options (steel
Page 26 and 27: Figure 1.3-2Relative Technical Risk
Page 28 and 29: In addition, the steel FPSO will:
Page 30 and 31: This system was evaluated as fourth
Page 32 and 33: Figure 1.4-1Project Development Sch
Page 34 and 35: 2.1 Regulatory RequirementsThe star
Page 36 and 37: • project summary booklet, which
Page 38 and 39: The first series of open houses fea
Page 40 and 41: 2.6 Media BriefingsHusky Oil repres
Page 42 and 43: 3 CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND BENEFITS PLAN
Page 44 and 45: 3.1.2 Canada-Newfoundland Benefit C
Page 46 and 47: The subsea contract package will co
Page 48 and 49: 3.1.3.6 Monitoring and ReportingHus
Page 50 and 51: • The operations/production phase
Page 52 and 53: • Husky Oil’s preferred develop
Page 54 and 55: 4.1.2 White Rose Structural Geology
Page 56 and 57: 4.2.1.3 West Avalon PoolOnly one we
Page 58 and 59: Reducing oil handling capacities ha
Page 60 and 61: 4.2.2.7 Reservoir ManagementReservo
Page 62 and 63: Side scan sonar images of the White
Page 64 and 65: Generators will be sized to meet th
Page 66 and 67: 4.5.3 Marine Support VesselsHusky O
Page 68 and 69: The offshore organization will cons
Page 72 and 73: Table 4.8-3Capital and Operating Co
Page 74 and 75: 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTThe
Page 76 and 77: The principal origins of the iceber
Page 78 and 79: white hake and winter flounder. The
Page 80 and 81: Produced water, although treated pr
Page 82 and 83: opportunity for interaction with bi
Page 84 and 85: The effects of project development,
Page 86 and 87: Additional mitigation measures for
Page 88 and 89: In summary, after mitigation measur
Page 90 and 91: 6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENTTh
Page 92 and 93: 6.1.2.1 EducationIn recent years, t
Page 94 and 95: 6.1.3.1 HousingThe number of dwelli
Page 96 and 97: Figure 6.1-1NAFO Divisions on the G
Page 98: During the development phase of the
Page 101 and 102: 6.2.3 Community Physical Infrastruc
Page 103 and 104: damage or foul gear. Any damage to
Page 105 and 106: have medical programs for their ope
Page 107 and 108: 7 SAFETY PLAN AND CONCEPT SAFETY AN
Page 109 and 110: Hazard prevention, detection and mi
Page 111 and 112: 7.1.5 Command StructureThe command
Page 113 and 114: 7.2.1 Major Hazard IdentificationTh
Page 115 and 116: 8 REFERENCESJWEL (Jacques Whitford
Page 117 and 118: Adams Pearson Associates Limited. 1
Page 119 and 120: Hycal Energy Research Laboratories
Page 121:
Schlumberger. 2000. Husky Oil et al
show all

white rose oilfield development application - Husky Energy

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?