11.07.2015 Views

Afghanistan Mortality Survey 2010 - Measure DHS

Afghanistan Mortality Survey 2010 - Measure DHS

Afghanistan Mortality Survey 2010 - Measure DHS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Afghanistan</strong>, in cooperation with the international community, has tried since 2008 to initiate a populationcensus. Because of the fluid security situation within the country, this has not been possible.An anomaly in <strong>Afghanistan</strong> is the reporting of population by sex. Girls are underreported relativeto boys in the younger age groups (below age 15) (Haub, 2009). A preference for sons is prevalent. Sexselectiveabortion is not a likely cause for the underreporting of girls, especially given the lack of moderntechnology. Most likely, some girls are reported as boys because some stigma is attached to families whoraise only girls, and as a result, the families may not wish to admit to their presence (Haub, 2009).1.3 HEALTH POLICIES, STRATEGIES, AND STRUCTURE OF THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM1.3.1 Evolution of Health Policy and StrategyThe general health of the Afghan people remained poor in the 1970s because of the war. Poorhealth was exacerbated by inadequate water supplies, poor sanitation and hygiene practices, unstablesecurity, lack of public policy on harmful products, unsafe drug use, danger in public places, uncontrolledwaste disposal, air and noise pollution, and food insecurity. The very weak foundation of the public healthsystem, threatened by constant war, made it even harder to deliver quality care to the general population.Health sector reform has flourished in <strong>Afghanistan</strong> since the 1980s in response to increasingrecognition of public sector inefficiencies in health care delivery. However, twenty years of unrest slowedimplementation of health programs. An interim National Health Policy (NHP) and National HealthStrategy (NHS) were developed during 2002-2004. This was followed by the development of the NHP2005-2009 and the NHS 2005-2006. The European Commission (EC), USAID, and the World Bank(WB), together with the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH), made efforts to rehabilitate <strong>Afghanistan</strong>’sdevastated health care system. A strategy to deliver a basic package of health services (BPHS) wasdeveloped in 2002 shortly after the establishment of the Transitional Islamic Republic of <strong>Afghanistan</strong>following the departure of the Taliban, when the country recorded some of the worst health statistics inthe world (MoPH, 2005). The BPHS was adopted through various mechanisms, including performancebasedpartnership agreements (PPAs), within the framework of government health policy. This approachis premised on the notion that delivery of a BPHS to the majority of Afghans will address the majorburden of disease and mortality through a set of sustainable, cost-effective interventions (Strong et al.,2005).The BPHS includes cost-effective interventions aimed at addressing the principal health problemsof the population, especially the most vulnerable groups—women and children. Provisions are also madeto eventually incorporate interventions targeting other vulnerable groups. In 2003, the MoPH adopted astrategy of contracting out the delivery of basic health care services to nonstate providers so that it couldconcentrate fully on its role as a steward of the NHS. Under three different contracting mechanisms,underwritten by the WB, USAID, and the EC, each representing a different philosophical approach to therelationship among the host country government, donor, and population, the BPHS is currently beingdelivered by contract with nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in 31 of the 34 provinces in<strong>Afghanistan</strong>. In the remaining three provinces, the MoPH is undertaking an experiment called the“Strengthening Mechanism,” by which it contracts with its own staff on the same terms as it contractswith NGOs. A key part of the strategic process that vastly enhanced the ability of the MoPH to managemany large NGO contracts was the establishment of the Grants and Contracts Management Unit (GCMU)in 2003. Situated within the MoPH, the GCMU has expanded rapidly with the BPHS, currently managingboth technically and financially, in conjunction with the Ministry of Finance (MoF), about US$125million worth of grants and contracts.Introduction | 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!