27.11.2012 Views

PIK Biennial Report 2000-2001 - Potsdam Institute for Climate ...

PIK Biennial Report 2000-2001 - Potsdam Institute for Climate ...

PIK Biennial Report 2000-2001 - Potsdam Institute for Climate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Potsdam</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Climate</strong> Impact Research in the Public Eye<br />

Public interest in global change, especially in the changing<br />

climate, remains high. The number of articles on the<br />

<strong>Potsdam</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Climate</strong> Impact Research appearing<br />

in the press over the last two years, suggests even<br />

that a tremendous growth in public interest has taken<br />

place. While some 400 articles appeared in the years 1998<br />

and 1999, nearly double so many – 720 – appeared in<br />

<strong>2000</strong> and <strong>2001</strong>. This figure represents only those articles<br />

in our records, taking into account no online publications<br />

and only a percentage of those in the <strong>for</strong>eign press.<br />

Additionally, conversations with people outside the institute<br />

make evident that the institute’s media presence is<br />

well recognized. Though the focus of our public relations<br />

is, in the first instance, quality rather than quantity,<br />

the institute is indeed well represented with an average of<br />

one newspaper article per day.<br />

Media interest was particularly high in early summer<br />

<strong>2001</strong>, during the negotiations on the Kyoto Protocol and<br />

with the appearance of the IPCC <strong>Report</strong> on the climate<br />

and climate impact, in which a number of the institute’s<br />

scientists played a significant role. The events of September<br />

11, <strong>2001</strong>, caused a noticeable shift of media interest<br />

to other issues. Though these recent trends do not fall<br />

within the period covered by this report, the gradual shift<br />

of media interest back to climate change was anticipated<br />

in the first half of 2002 and appears to be returning to a<br />

level typical of the last few years.<br />

Moreover, the media appears to be conveying an increasingly<br />

more complex understanding of climate change,<br />

indicating that the message from scientists concerning<br />

the complexity of the Earth system and the compelling<br />

relationship between global warming and environmental<br />

problems is reaching more publishers and “sinking in” to<br />

more heads. Media interest revolves less and less on the<br />

question of whether or not the weather last Tuesday had<br />

anything to do with global warming. The public no<br />

longer appears to want a simplified understanding of scientific<br />

questions and answers. Increasingly, it tends to<br />

recognize the probabilistic character of climate and climate<br />

impact research and does not shy away when complex<br />

and thus more complicated issues are raised, which<br />

cannot be addressed with a simple “yes” or “no”. This<br />

holds true <strong>for</strong> schools, organizations, individuals and<br />

politicians who come to us <strong>for</strong> materials, lectures and<br />

consultations.<br />

Margret Boysen, <strong>PIK</strong>´s Public Relations Manager<br />

and Main Editor of the <strong>Biennial</strong> <strong>Report</strong>.<br />

The growth in public concern on global warming and climate<br />

change can be readily observed in the press and<br />

public relations office. The numerous public lectures<br />

held by institute scientists has certainly contributed to<br />

this growth. Yet this is a trend that could all too readily<br />

come to an end as a result of one or another shift in<br />

political relations, which strongly influence the media.<br />

Despite its considerable success, our public relations<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts in the area of television have proved difficult.<br />

With the exception of interviews (in <strong>2000</strong>-<strong>2001</strong> the institute<br />

was represented in more than a hundred radio and<br />

television interviews), TV’s hunger <strong>for</strong> pictures cannot<br />

always be satisfied. Given its limited resources, the work<br />

of the institute gives preference to model calculation<br />

rather than the visualization of research results. Moreover,<br />

scenarios developed by the institute are not prophecies.<br />

We are often concerned that catastrophic images of<br />

the future only fulfil the need <strong>for</strong> sensation and fear and,<br />

in the long run, will have no impact upon viewers. The<br />

<strong>Potsdam</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Climate</strong> Impact Research thus<br />

strives continuously to awaken public interest in the fascinating,<br />

intricate relationships involved in environmental<br />

research. These are complex interrelationships which<br />

must first be mastered cognitively, not tactilely or visually.<br />

Even when the visual is clearly desirable, it is not of<br />

<strong>for</strong>emost concern <strong>for</strong> the institute. Our press release on<br />

stochastic resonance as a trigger <strong>for</strong> extreme temperature<br />

fluctuations during the last ice age demonstrates that<br />

even complicated subjects are well received by newspapers<br />

and their readers. The number of German articles at<br />

six was rather low, but the quality of the articles in view<br />

of their complexity was surprisingly good.<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!