27.11.2012 Views

PIK Biennial Report 2000-2001 - Potsdam Institute for Climate ...

PIK Biennial Report 2000-2001 - Potsdam Institute for Climate ...

PIK Biennial Report 2000-2001 - Potsdam Institute for Climate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TO<strong>PIK</strong> 7 - <strong>PIK</strong>uliar Culture<br />

<strong>PIK</strong> operates in a vast scientific field - global change and<br />

Earth system analysis - that is as yet largely unexplored.<br />

Serious challenges arise from the complexity of the systems<br />

considered, from the necessity <strong>for</strong> truly interdisciplinary<br />

research which they imply, from the absence of a<br />

comprehensive data base, and from the fact that most of<br />

the pursued research activities rely heavily on computa-<br />

IMEQ<br />

Integrating Models and Ensuring their Quality<br />

Project speaker: Gerhard Petschel-Held<br />

<strong>PIK</strong> project members: Nicola Botta, Hermann Held,<br />

Cezar Ionescu, Rupert Klein.<br />

Research Questions<br />

IMEQ’s goal is to develop principles of high-quality<br />

integrated modelling and strategies <strong>for</strong> implementing<br />

them. Particular emphasis was to be given to the coupling<br />

of models with the aim of answering specific<br />

research questions. In this context, the following issues<br />

were raised:<br />

• How can individual models in global change research<br />

be classified to pave the way <strong>for</strong> integration and quality<br />

assurance? Which categories are helpful with<br />

respect to a model’s object (atmosphere, ocean, economics<br />

etc.), structure, scales, implementation, capacity<br />

<strong>for</strong> coupling, and integration? Which categories<br />

relate to each model’s aims, i.e., the questions each<br />

model is supposed to answer, and the questions it is<br />

capable of answering?<br />

• How can we classify "integrated" research questions,<br />

i.e., questions that can be answered by coupling individual<br />

models? How is such a classification related to<br />

the classification of individual models? Can we<br />

develop a joint classification scheme <strong>for</strong> models and<br />

questions which would allow us to deduce which<br />

models need to be coupled in which way in order to<br />

obtain answers to specific types of integrated research<br />

questions?<br />

• How does uncertainty assessment, including intrinsic<br />

model limitation assessment and error estimation,<br />

relate to quality assurance in integrated models?<br />

• What do model interfaces (both in a model-inherent<br />

disciplinary, and in a software-technological sense)<br />

look like? How general a definition can be found <strong>for</strong><br />

interfaces and how flexible do they have to be?<br />

54<br />

tional modelling. In response, within "<strong>PIK</strong>uliar Culture",<br />

<strong>PIK</strong> intends to establish a functioning interdisciplinary<br />

dialogue, to reflect the philosophical background of its<br />

research, to develop common priorities and standards of<br />

quality, and to synchronize and, if necessary, extend<br />

existing disciplinary scientific procedures.<br />

State of Work and the Project’s Future<br />

There are basically two complementary approaches to<br />

tackle the questions raised:<br />

• Analyse and categorize existing models along internal<br />

specifics and categories like physiological/functional/<br />

statistical or numerical/symbolic. This might be called<br />

a bottom-up approach.<br />

• Starting from a set of requirements on quality of individual<br />

and integrated models, set up a catalogue of criteria<br />

and standards to be used as a guideline <strong>for</strong> the<br />

models and coupling procedures.<br />

The project’s first target was the organization of the<br />

mathematically oriented symposium in the framework of<br />

the First Sustainability Days. From its sessions the following<br />

conclusions were drawn:<br />

• Concepts used in applied mathematics and computing<br />

science offer significant potential <strong>for</strong> improvement of<br />

current models in sustainability science and <strong>for</strong> their<br />

quantitative assessment.<br />

• Modern software engineering is at the core of recent<br />

developments of model coupling technologies aiming<br />

at the much-desired modularity of applications.<br />

• There is a range of different uncertainty types which<br />

might be classified according to the language used (e.g.<br />

the temperature is 15.0 °C vs. it is warm) and the<br />

measures quantifying the degree of uncertainties (e.g.<br />

probability vs. possibility).<br />

• Hybrid modelling has been advanced considerably,<br />

combining quantitative with qualitative in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

Despite a general feeling that the conceptual work within<br />

IMEQ is greatly needed to achieve <strong>PIK</strong>’s ambitious<br />

goals, the project’s activities have been regrouped under<br />

two other related <strong>PIK</strong> projects: PIAM and PIRSIQ.<br />

PIAM (cf page42) focuses on practical implementations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!