12.07.2015 Views

Literatur zur Tugendethik Bibliography on Virtue ... - Academic Room

Literatur zur Tugendethik Bibliography on Virtue ... - Academic Room

Literatur zur Tugendethik Bibliography on Virtue ... - Academic Room

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Oxford, S. 136–57.2009 [82] Chappell, Timothy (2009): Ethics and Experience. Life Bey<strong>on</strong>d Moral Theory, M<strong>on</strong>treal, S. 97–124 (“<strong>Virtue</strong> Ethics”).2006 [83] Chappell, Timothy (Hrsg.) (2006): Values and <strong>Virtue</strong>s: Aristotelianism in C<strong>on</strong>temporary Ethics,Oxford. 291992 [84] Chapman, John W./Galst<strong>on</strong>, William A. (Hrsg.) (1992): <strong>Virtue</strong> (Nomos 34), New York.2009 [85] Christensen, Anne-Marie S. (2009): Getting It Right in Ethical Experience: John McDowell and<strong>Virtue</strong> Ethics, Journal of Value Inquiry 43, S. 493–506.1998 [86] Churchland, Paul M. (1998): Toward a Cognitive Neurobiology of the Moral <strong>Virtue</strong>s, Topoi 17,S. 83–96.2010 [87] Clarke, Bridget (2010): <strong>Virtue</strong> and Disagreement, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13, S.273–91. 301990 [88] Clowney, D. (1990): <strong>Virtue</strong>s, Rules and the Foundati<strong>on</strong>s of Ethics, Philosophia 20, S. 49–68.1995 [89] Comte-Sp<strong>on</strong>ville, André (1995): Ermutigung zum unzeitgemäßen Leben. Ein kleines Brevier derTugenden und Werte, Reinbek bei Hamburg 1998.1988 [90] C<strong>on</strong>ly, Sarah (1988): Flourishing and the Failure of the Ethics of <strong>Virtue</strong>, in Midwest Studies inPhilosophy Vol. XIII: Ethical Theory: Character and <strong>Virtue</strong>, hrsg. v<strong>on</strong> Peter A.French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. und Howard K. Wettstein, Notre Dame, S. 83–96.2006 [91] Coope, Christopher Miles (2006): Modern <strong>Virtue</strong> Ethics, in Values and <strong>Virtue</strong>s: Aristotelianismin C<strong>on</strong>temporary Ethics, hrsg. v<strong>on</strong> Timothy Chappell, Oxford, S. 20–52.1975 [92] Cooper, John M. (1975): Reas<strong>on</strong> and Human Good in Aristotle, Indianapolis 1986.2930C<strong>on</strong>tents: Introducti<strong>on</strong>, Timothy Chappell. 1. Modern virtue ethics, Christopher Coope. 2. The admirablelife and the desirable life, Linda Zagzebski. 3. <strong>Virtue</strong> and rights in Aristotle’s best regime, Fred Miller. 4.The virtues and vices of virtue jurisprudence, Ant<strong>on</strong>y Duff. 5. Habituati<strong>on</strong> as mimêsis, Hallvard Fossheim.6. Moral incompetence, Adam Mort<strong>on</strong>. 7. The variety of life and the unity of practical wisdom, TimothyChappell. 8. Moral sense and virtue in Hume’s ethics , Paul Russell. 9. Can Nietzsche be both a virtueethicist and an existentialist?, Christine Swant<strong>on</strong>. 10. Manners, morals, and practical wisdom, Karen Stohr.11. The hardboiled detective as moralist, Sandrine Berges. 12. ‘Like the Bloom <strong>on</strong> Youths’: How pleasurecompletes our lives, Johan Braennmark. 13. Mixed determinates: pleasure, good, and truth, TheodoreScaltsas. 14. Three dogmas of desire, Talbot Brewer.“One of the most prominent strands in c<strong>on</strong>temporary work <strong>on</strong> the virtues c<strong>on</strong>sists in the attempt to developa distinctive – and compelling – account of practical reas<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the basis of Aristotle’s ethics. In resp<strong>on</strong>se tothis project, several eminent critics have argued that the Aristotelian account encourages a dismissiveattitude toward moral disagreement. Given the importance of developing a mature resp<strong>on</strong>se todisagreement, the criticism is devastating if true. I examine this line of criticism closely, first elucidatingthe features of the Aristotelian account that motivate it, and then identifying two further features of theaccount that the criticism overlooks. These further features show the criticism to be entirely unwarranted.Once these features are acknowledged, a more promising line of criticism suggests itself – namely, that theAristotelian account does too little to help us to resolve disputes – but that line of objecti<strong>on</strong> will have to becarried out <strong>on</strong> quite different grounds.”12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!