Literatur zur Tugendethik Bibliography on Virtue ... - Academic Room

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2009 [226] Kawall, Jason (2009): Virtue Theory, Ideal Observers, and the Supererogatory, PhilosophicalStudies 146, S. 179–96. 521996 [227] Keefer, Matthew Wilks (1996): The Inseparability of Morality and Well-being: The Duty/VirtueDebate Revisited, Journal of Moral Education 25, S. 277–90.2007 [228] Keller, Simon (2007): Virtue ethics is self-effacing, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85, S.221–31. 531997 [229] Kelly, Eugene (1997): Revisiting Max Scheler’s Formalism in Ethics: Virtue-Based Ethics andMoral Rules in the Non-Formal Ethics of Value, Journal of Value Inquiry 31, S. 381–97.2002 [230] Kersting, Wolfgang (2002): Kritik der Gleichheit. Über die Grenzen der Gerechtigkeit und derMoral, Weilerswist, S. 217–54 („Zur Geschichte der Tugend“).2000 [231] Kihlbom, Ulrik (2000): Guidance and Justification in Particularistic Ethics, Bioethics 14, S.287–309. 541983 [232] Kilcullen, John (1983): Utilitarianism and Virtue, Ethics 93, S. 451–66.1997 [233] Koehn, Daryl (1997): Virtue Ethics, in The Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business525354intuition, and to argue that virtue ethicists have ample resources to respond to these worries. Theexplanatory primacy of the virtuous over the right or the good emerges as a distinct and viable position.”“I argue that recent virtue theories (including those of Hursthouse, Slote, and Swanton) face importantinitial difficulties in accommodating the supererogatory. In particular, I consider several potentialcharacterizations of the supererogatory modeled upon these familiar virtue theories (and their accounts ofrightness) and argue that they fail to provide an adequate account of supererogation. In the second half ofthe paper I sketch an alternative virtue-based characterization of supererogation, one that is grounded in theattitudes of virtuous ideal observers, and that avoids the concerns raised in the first part of the paper.”“An ethical theory is self-effacing if it tells us that sometimes, we should not be motivated by theconsiderations that justify our acts. In his influential paper ‘The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories’[1976], Michael Stocker argues that consequentialist and deontological ethical theories must be selfeffacing,if they are to be at all plausible. Stocker’s argument is often taken to provide a reason to give upconsequentialism and deontology in favour of virtue ethics. I argue that this assessment is a mistake. Virtueethics is self-effacing in just the same way as are the theories that Stocker attacks. Or, at the very least: ifthere is a way for virtue ethics to avoid self-effacement then there are ways for its rivals to avoid selfeffacementtoo. Therefore, considerations of self-effacement provide no reason to prefer virtue ethics to itsmajor rivals.”“This paper argues that, contrary to a common line of criticism followed by scholars such as Helga Kuhse, aparticularistic version of virtue ethics properly elaborated, can provide sound moral guidance and asatisfactory account for moral justification of our opinions regarding, for instance, health care practice. Inthe first part of the paper, three criteria for comparing normative theories with respect to action-guidingpower are outlined, and it is argued that the presented particularistic version of virtue ethics actually canprovide more guidance than the universalistic theories favoured by Kuhse and others. In the second part ofthe paper it is claimed that universalist normative theories have serious problems accounting for the rolethat moral principles are supposed to play in the justification, of moral opinions, whereas the presentversion of virtue ethics accommodates a plausible alternative idea of justification without invoking moralprinciples or eschewing objectivity.”24
Ethics, hrsg. von Patricia H. Werhane und R. Edward Freeman, Oxford, S. 647–50.2008 [234] Koggel, Christine (2008): Burdening the Burdened Virtues, Hypatia 23, S. 197–204. – Zu [440].2008 [235] Kristjánsson, Kristján (2008): An Aristotelian Critique of Situationism, Philosophy 83, S. 55–76. 551987 [236] Kruschwitz, R./Roberts R. (Hrsg.) (1987): The Virtues. Contemporary Essays on MoralCharacter, Belmont, Cal.1998 [237] Kultgen, John (1998): The Vicissitudes of Common-Sense Virtue Ethics, Part I: From Aristotleto Slote, Journal of Value Inquiry 32, S. 325–41.1998 [238] Kultgen, John (1998): The Vicissitudes of Common-Sense Virtue Ethics, Part II: The HeuristicUse of Common Sense, Journal of Value Inquiry 32, S. 465–78.1999 [239] Kupfer, Joseph (1999): Visions of Virtue in Popular Film, Boulder. 562007 [240] Kupfer, Joseph H. (2007): Prostitutes, Musicians, and Self-Respect: Virtues and Vices ofPersonal Life, Lanham. 571988 [241] Kupperman, Joel J. (1988): Character and Ethical Theory, in Midwest Studies in PhilosophyVol. XIII: Ethical Theory: Character and Virtue, hrsg. von Peter A. French, TheodoreE. Uehling, Jr. und Howard K. Wettstein, Notre Dame, S. 115–25.1991 [242] Kupperman, Joel J. (1991): Character, New York, S. 90–114 (“Justice and the Virtues”).2001 [243] Kupperman, Joel J. (2001): The Indispensability of Character, Philosophy 76, S. 239–50. – Zu[171].2006 [244] Kupperman, Joel J. (2006): Six Myths About the Good Life: Thinking About What Has Value,Indianapolis, S. 82–109 (“Myth Five – There Is No Real Connection, At Least in ThisLife, Between True Virtue and a Desirable Kind of Life”), S. 110–27 (“Myth Six – True555657“Aristotle says that no human achievement has the stability of activities that express virtue. Ethicalsituationists consider this claim to be refutable by empirical evidence. If that is true, not onlyAristotelianism, but folk psychology, contemporary virtue ethics and character education have all beenseriously infirmed. The aim of this paper is threefold: (1) to offer a systematic classification of the existingobjections against situationism under four main headings: ‘the methodological objection’, ‘the moraldilemma objection’, ‘the bullet-biting objection’ and ‘the anti-behaviouristic objection’; (2) to resuscitate amore powerful Aristotelian version of the ‘anti-behaviouristic objection’ than advanced by previous critics;and (3) to explore some of the implications of such resuscitation for our understanding of the salience ofcharacter and for future studies of its nature.”“Synopsis: Out of the interplay between film criticism and a philosophical view of virtue, Joseph Kupferargues that film fictions can be integral to moral reflection, and thus by examining the narrative andcinematic aspects of popular films, we can derive important moral truths about people and their behaviour.Taking as his base a classical conception of virtue and vice, Kupfer offers an in-depth examination of“Groundhog Day”, “The African Queen”, “Parenthood”, “Rob Roy”, “Fresh”, “Jaws” and “Aliens” in orderto investigate the value of virtue within ever-widening social contexts.” (Amazon.co.uk)“Introduction. Chapter 1. The Moral Perspective of Humility. Chapter 2. Sentimentalizing Emotion.Chapter 3. Generosity of Spirit. Chapter 4. Overcoming Envy. Chapter 5. When Waiting is Weightless: TheVirtue of Patience. Chapter 6. No Regrets, No Debts: The Virtue of Gratitude. Chapter 7. Romantic Loveand Moral Growth. Chapter 8. Prostitutes, Musicians, and Self-Respect. Conclusion.”25
Page 1: Literatur
Page 4 and 5: national Journal of Management Revi
Page 6: 53.2010 [39] Battaly, Heather (2010
Page 9 and 10: 2005 [60] Brady, Michael S. (2005):
Page 11 and 12: 2008 [72] Calhoun, Cheshire (2008):
Page 13 and 14: 1998 [93] Cooper, John M. (1998): T
Page 15 and 16: 2005 [120] Doris, John M. (2005): R
Page 17 and 18: 1978 [138] Foot, Philippa (1978): V
Page 19 and 20: 1996 [166] Griffin, James (1996): V
Page 21 and 22: 166-84.1996 [188] Hooker, Brad (199
Page 23: Theory and Moral Practice 8, S. 387
Page 27 and 28: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosoph
Page 29 and 30: 2009 [280] Miller, Christian (2009)
Page 31 and 32: 2000 [299] Oderberg, David S. (2000
Page 33 and 34: Moral Education 24, S. 175-184.1997
Page 35 and 36: Southern Journal of Philosophy 14,
Page 37 and 38: 1997 [379] Slote, Michael (1997): V
Page 39 and 40: 2009 [401] Sreenivasan, Gopal (2009
Page 41 and 42: 2010 [416] Stohr, Karen E. (2010):
Page 43 and 44: 2008 [441] Tessman, Lisa (2008): Re
Page 45 and 46: 2009 [457] van Zyl, Liezl (2009): A
Page 47 and 48: 2006 [475] Webber, Jonathan (2006):
Page 49 and 50: 2008 [484] White, Richard (2008): R

Literatur zur Tugendethik Bibliography on Virtue ... - Academic Room

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?